- Sep 25, 2018
dude, what are you saying, he already admitted that he said it:Speaking of people making stuff up and starting rumors, you know how many times it was mentioned that you could win with 17 DV points in the diplomatic victory thread? ZERO. I just went back and read through the whole thread, and not a single person made that claim. The only person attempting to start this rumor seems to be... you. To argue with yourself, I guess?
"Hey, my sources are from others you cannot identify, you shall not blame me", says Lily.
and it was in this thread, which is also where this feud between @Lily_Lancer and @leandrombraz seems to have started:You wouldn't win with 17, I assumed that wrong
And the feud is getting old fast.So if you start this congress with 17 points, you gonna get +3 and win the game before the 3 you lost can be subtract. To put it simple, you got 3 guaranteed points in the first post-modern congress, which mean all you need is 17 points to win as soon as it comes up, doesn't matter how much Civs you have in your game.
@Lily_Lancer, it's good that you have corrected this rumor but might I make a suggestion that could help improve relations in the future? Something called Hanlon's Razor: Do not attribute to malice that which can be explained adequately by carelessness.
He already explained that he had assumed it can be won by 17 due to behavior seen from winning at 18 or 19. Yes, technically he may have started a rumor but I doubt this was intentional. To say
would be attributing malice and a failure to use Hanlon's razor. Let's all try to get along.this is their goal.