It may be his charisma or smarts (funny that you bring this up in the context of this thread), but he's not really the only one who that applies to (except, again, in the smarts aspect, see the subject of this topic).
To be fair, there's far more evidence pointing to scientists having useful scientific knowledge than there is to economists having useful economics knowledge.
It's funny you should say that, because it seems it already is. There aren't very many politicians that base their reasoning on facts. Science is, indeed, something not known to the men wishing to lead their country.
Why do you want them separate? Don't you want policy decisions to be based on observation and sound analysis? I sure do. The alternative is something the Bush's were proud of: "We don't agree with the 'reality-based' community."
Very accurate and very cool of You to say so ^^ I'm not a scientis man ! Certailny I have an inquisitive nature but scientist go to hell while righteous people go to heaven thing convinces me the most not to be an scientist !
Lets see, if we always took science at it's word when some people have an idea, then we would still believe that the sun revolves around the earth and that blacks are inferior to whites. So often what is scientific fact one decade is scientific nonsense the next decade.
Lets see, if we always took science at it's word when some people have an idea, then we would still believe that the sun revolves around the earth and that blacks are inferior to whites. So often what is scientific fact one decade is scientific nonsense the next decade.
I don't care about the religious beliefs of politicians, I'd vote for a Muslim, Hindu, Agnostic, or Atheist if I agreed with his or her view on how the country should be run.
I don't care about the religious beliefs of politicians, I'd vote for a Muslim, Hindu, Agnostic, or Atheist if I agreed with his or her view on how the country should be run.
So, bickering aside, I take it you agree that what should be taught in the Biology class should be up to experts in the field of biology, not politicians.
Because ID is most certainly a religious concept. Politicians have no ground to force that into a scientific classroom.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
thing convinces me the most not to be an scientist ! 
Would love to live on your hard earned G Mr F.
