1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Increased Bombardment for Aircraft in DG3

Discussion in 'Civ3 - Demo Game II: Polls' started by Shaitan, Apr 23, 2003.

?

How much should we increase bombardment strength for aircraft?

  1. +0%

    12 vote(s)
    48.0%
  2. +10%

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
  3. +20%

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
  4. +30%

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
  5. +40%

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
  6. +50%

    8 vote(s)
    32.0%
  7. +60%

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. +70%

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. +80%

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. +90%

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  11. +100%

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Shaitan

    Shaitan der Besucher

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,546
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    The preliminary poll for modifications showed a majority approval for modifying an increase in bombard strength for all aircraft. This poll will determine what increase will be given. This poll will be interpreted by finding the majority cutoff point at the conclusion of the poll. That means if 51% vote for increases of +40% or less we will use +40% as our modification.

    This poll will remain open for a minimum of 24 hours. Note that there is no quorum and no abstain option is provided. The table below shows the bombard values for each unit at each increase level.
    Code:
    [b][i]Unit		+0%     +10%    +20%    +30%    +40%    +50%    +60%    +70%    +80%    +90%    +100%[/i][/b]
    
    Fighter		2	2	2	3	3	3	3	3	4	4	4
    Jet Fighter	2	2	2	3	3	3	3	3	4	4	4
    F-15		4	4	5	5	6	6	6	7	7	8	8
    Stealth Fighter	4	4	5	5	6	6	6	7	7	8	8
    Bomber		8	9	10	10	11	12	13	14	14	15	16
    Stealth Bomber	8	9	10	10	11	12	13	14	14	15	16
    Cruise Missile	16	18	19	21	22	24	26	27	29	30	32
     
  2. Shaitan

    Shaitan der Besucher

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,546
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Personally I'd still rather not tinker and I voted for +0%.
     
  3. Peri

    Peri Vote early and vote often

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,261
    Same view as in the other poll.
    Say no to GM Civ III;)

    I should apologise for not attributing that quote to you since I blatantly stole it:)
     
  4. Eklektikos

    Eklektikos Eponymous

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,635
    Location:
    London, UK
    My sentiments exactly :hammer:
     
  5. disorganizer

    disorganizer Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,233
    NO-MOD! +0%
     
  6. Bootstoots

    Bootstoots Warlord Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,385
    Location:
    Mid-Illinois
    I voted for 0%. Increasing bombardment strength is unnecessary, IMHO.
     
  7. Shaitan

    Shaitan der Besucher

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,546
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Odd. Nobody has voiced out in support of increases but there are 8 votes at various levels.
     
  8. Donovan Zoi

    Donovan Zoi The Return

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2002
    Messages:
    4,960
    Location:
    Chicago
    Let me join the ranks of the vocal "0%-ers."

    If we are playing this game at monarch, I see no need for us to grant ourselves any further advantages.
     
  9. Shaitan

    Shaitan der Besucher

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,546
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    This poll is at a dead heat with 10 votes for +0% and 10 votes for +10% or more. It will remain open at least until tomorrow morning (my time - EST).
     
  10. Bootstoots

    Bootstoots Warlord Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,385
    Location:
    Mid-Illinois
    This isn't going to delay the opening of the new forums, is it? I think you should move it to this to the new forums as soon as they're put up.
     
  11. Shaitan

    Shaitan der Besucher

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,546
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    No, the new forums will be opened as soon as TF can open them. This poll won't hold anything up.
     
  12. amirsan

    amirsan King of all Kings

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    6,530
    Location:
    NYC to Connectcut...
    50% sounds fair... not much of an advantage because the AI gets the same, right.
     
  13. GenMarshall

    GenMarshall Widowmaker: Ghost Operative

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2002
    Messages:
    42,690
    Location:
    Versailles City, United Systems of New Coruscant
    They All get the modifcations.
     
  14. Shaitan

    Shaitan der Besucher

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,546
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    50% is a huge difference. It will give us a monumentous advantage because we have the intelligence to exploit it.
     
  15. burning_phoneix

    burning_phoneix Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia
    I dont like anytype of Modification to the game
     
  16. Gingerbread Man

    Gingerbread Man Dark Magus

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,078
    Location:
    Ooorstrailier!
    Aircraft are powerful enough as it is.

    You dont know what 20 bombers cand do... :D
     
  17. FionnMcCumhall

    FionnMcCumhall Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Phoenix, Arizona
    i say an increase would be good, add something new to the game
     
  18. Shaitan

    Shaitan der Besucher

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,546
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Okay, the other one was decided by one vote and so is this one, just the opposite way.

    12 votes for +0%
    13 votes for +10% or more

    DG3 will be played with a +10% modification to aircraft bombardment strength.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page