IOT Developmental Thread

look i know this game is going to be in the Renaissance, an era i know nothing about. if i seem too advanced in that game please tell me. i may accidentally power-game my nation, and i apologize for that in advance.
 
I mostly agree.

Also, I never said I was gonna be a dictatorship.

And, Athenian Democracy fell anyway. But if what we voted on is subject to the votes, I vote we ban Mathalamus and anyone else who tries to powergame.

Which is . . . everyone who opposes you?

But that's as far as I'm gonna go on this line - this is devolving dangerously close to spam.

- Lighthearter
 
Could you ban Math to? His Byzantium super-state and constant power-gaming gets on my nerves. I mean, I'll bet his nation would be Greek rebels trying to restore the empire (which not only do I approve of, but welcome it, as it would be interesting if done right), but he'll claim his rag-tag army will technology be superior to me, have more men, scare the **** out of my men, win every single battle (de jure, of course. If I siege and burn Athens to the ground, and he claims a de facto victory, I'll cry myself to sleep), etc, etc.

Also, I have a great idea. Why not use AoE III to simulate battles? I own it, and would be more than happy to do it for you guys, because I'm nice like that (However, that means I'll need to buy Asian Dynasties, as some people want to play as Asians. I already have Warchiefs, though). There's a lot of countries, each with their own, fitting units, and I bet many would play as the exact nations themselves, with a few that need to improvise (Scavadavia using Russia, Italy using Spain, among others. One nation that needs no improvising surprisingly is Germany. Tell me when Germany actually colonized.). Warchiefs add playable natives (Though only three, so unless you're the Iroquois, Aztecs, or Sioux, you're not going to be the exact nation), and AD adds another three (India, China, and Japan).
 
Think basic Muskets, Cavalry with primitive pistols and Pikes by 1600.

EDIT: Quintuple X-Post. I recall the AoE AI being quite good, so AoE III is good. Math hasn't really been doing bad stuff lately - He's handed over the reigns to Domination, and we'll...punish him if there is power-gaming. I'm all for a very small but powerful army, but it should be known when there is powergaming.
 
Could you ban Math to? His Byzantium super-state and constant power-gaming gets on my nerves. I mean, I'll bet his nation would be Greek rebels trying to restore the empire (which not only do I approve of, but welcome it, as it would be interesting if done right), but he'll claim his rag-tag army will technology be superior to me, have more men, scare the **** out of my men, win every single battle (de jure, of course. If I siege and burn Athens to the ground, and he claims a de facto victory, I'll cry myself to sleep), etc, etc.

Also, I have a great idea. Why not use AoE III to simulate battles? I own it, and would be more than happy to do it for you guys, because I'm nice like that (However, that means I'll need to buy Asian Dynasties, as some people want to play as Asians. I already have Warchiefs, though). There's a lot of countries, each with their own, fitting units, and I bet many would play as the exact nations themselves, with a few that need to improvise (Scavadavia using Russia, Italy using Spain, among others. One nation that needs no improvising surprisingly is Germany. Tell me when Germany actually colonized.). Warchiefs add playable natives (Though only three, so unless you're the Iroquois, Aztecs, or Sioux, you're not going to be the exact nation), and AD adds another three (India, China, and Japan).

Can you vote no to banning me please?

Also, I actually also voted to ban Math, its 2-0 right now.
 
I mostly agree.

Also, I never said I was gonna be a dictatorship.

And, Athenian Democracy fell anyway. But if what we voted on is subject to the votes, I vote we ban Mathalamus and anyone else who tries to powergame.

:huh:

You're contradicting yourself AND you want to ban your only ally (ilduce)?
 
How about, even if Domination posts in the thread, Joe just ignores it? Then, he'll claim, declare war, etc. without actually being in the game.

As for the map I vote Europa Universalis III.
 
Domination, you are saying the ban against you is not justified, and you are voting to ban Mathalamus? Oh, please.

(Bolded so everyone would see it in the clamor)
 
Please, I'm not that stupid...

Also, Athenian Democracy is out anyway.
While Athenian Democracy is out...

Technically I could propose a new motion;

I Propose we Kick the Member Domination 3000, For Various actions. And his little friend IlDuce as well.

See Its entierly seperate from Athenian Democracy.. :):)
 
I will not Power game. I will be playing as a country I just did a history essay (2 months ago) on for this time period. I will be combining parts of their government structure, military and economy from 600-1600ad. This cannot be in anyway related to powergaming.
 
While Athenian Democracy is out...

Technically I could propose a new motion;

I Propose we Kick the Member Domination 300, For Various actions.

See Its entierly seperate from Athenian Democracy.. :):)

I could really care less about whether or not Domination 300 is banned;)

Seriously though, as the game hasn't started, I have broken no rules. Also, this is the issue with Democracy. Tanicius had the right idea in the first place. While some things should be up for vote, this is just...

*Insert Facepalm Here, I'm too lazy to get a picture*

PS: Really guys, I don't see this going through, but, really, just stop, there's no reason for it.
 
Back
Top Bottom