Is Civilization VI SP for the INFP "Dreamer"?

Aristos

Lightseeker
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
3,912
Location
Deep inside...
The Strategy Gamer published an intriguing article today, linking the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) with the "perfect" strategy game for each type.

MBTI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers–Briggs_Type_Indicator

Article: https://www.strategygamer.com/articles/myers-briggs-personality-strategy-games/

According to it, Civ 6 Single Player is the "perfect" game for INFP ("Dreamers") types. I wonder if they have a point? Is this why some people seem to love this game more than others? I know I am not an INFP, so I have to wonder...

What do you think? Fun reading, by the way.
 

DWilson

Where am I? What turn is it?
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
1,924
Location
Milwaukee, WI, USA
As someone who is probably ENTP, but scores back and forth between INTP and ENTP, apparently I need to get Stellaris as well.
 

Duuk

Doom-Sayer
Supporter
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
1,975
Location
Detroit, Michigan, USA
Apparently I should be playing Co-Op Starcraft II.

I haven't played Starcraft since like the early 90s...
 

bbbt

Deity
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
2,414
Yeah it was an interesting to read. Civ and divinity are probably my two favorite games on that list. Bizarrely I tend to beeborderline Ior E - often depends on the mood imI in when I take the test. Not really NFP though.
 

TheMarshmallowBear

Benelovent Chieftain of the Ursu Kingdom
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
7,771
Location
Inside a Ziggurat
I am an INTP (although I also scored close to being an INFP), but I don't actually enjoy Stellaris, there's too much to manage for me.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
525
I think I also match either INTP or INFP, will give Stellaris a shot too :) I do enjoy StarCraft II online as well though it is pretty stressful at times. Glad to see so many strategy game suggestions though, would like to go through each one and see which ones I might want to pick up as well.

Edit: StarCraft II co-op is nice too! It's the 1v1s that get a bit hectic.
 

AmazonQueen

Virago
Moderator
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
8,043
Location
Sailing the Homeward Ocean
92% INFP. I enjoy Civ and Stellaris but CK2 is probably my favourite strategy game. I don't like multiplayer which does fit my type I suppose but I like playing RPGs and boardgames with real people. I supect my dislike of multiplayer is because unlike face to face gaming it isn't very social rather than because I'm quite introverted.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
11,479
Location
Las Vegas
I guess I'm a dreamer then. Reminds me of a Dio song (I could have been a dreamer).
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
525
I think though there's enough to Civ 6 that you can enjoy it as long as you like strategy games. I don't think of it as a hardcore strategy game, but rather a fun and accessible one that can invest you into building a story. I think it has enough appeal for players who aren't looking for the toughest strategic challenges. For that I'd say the grand strategy games would be more suitable, though of course you sacrifice accessibility and will have to spend quite some time investing in learning how to actually explore the strategies of those games.

I tend to think of different games when I'm in different moods. These days as I'm waiting for GS I play a lot of Overwatch - I can take it seriously when I want to and at other times just practice my sniper skills with widowmaker. I'm trying to get back into XCOM2 as well, though I try to not lose any soldiers while playing on ironman (no reloading saves) so that gets challenging... I should avoid ironman until I've finished the game once :D
 

Zaarin

Diplomatic Attaché to Londo Mollari
Joined
May 14, 2016
Messages
10,410
Location
Babylon 5
INFJ--I tried CK2. Pass. :p

The Myers-Briggs test is complete pseudoscience
No, enneagram is complete pseudoscience. :p If you expect a personality test to tell you who you are or what you should do or who you should click with or if you try to read it like a horoscope, then yes, it's nonsense, but as a method of classifying personalities I think it has its value. Myers-Briggs is at least nuanced, unlike the aforementioned enneagram (the popularity of which leaves me baffled--you'll get more specific answers from a fortune cookie :p ).
 
Top Bottom