Is hiring to project an image morally OK?

jeps said:
well, MODELS and waitresses are different.

Model: A person employed to display merchandise, such as clothing or cosmetics.
If your job is to project an image, and they hire you to project an image, its all good. if they hire you not to project an image, they are complete and utter idiots.

waitresses jobs are to take orders and serve food. not to project an image. thats the difference
Click to expand...

what about hooters?
 
Well this discussion never blossomed.....
 
Is it moral that we shut people out from these opportunities? I'll never be a model, but I don't resent those that are.
 
You're under no pressure to purchase from a company which does hire models. People are shallow, though, if you let them be.
 
Harbringer said:
Pertaining to companies, like clothing stores hiring specific types of individuals to help promote there stores image. For example, the American Clothing store Aercrombie and Fitch specifically looks for Blonde Hair Blue eyes girls and typically "American" boys. Is this morally acceptable? If not why? Personally I likened it today to hiring a piano player with natural born talent over one who practices and plays diligently.

This is not a thread to discuss what I think is the underlying issue(that were so damn vain and sheep like in the first place) but to discuss the issue at hand. I personally honestly have no real stance.
Click to expand...

If you're selling image then yes image matters.
 
Ecofarm said:
Hooters is not a wildly successful national chain franchise because of their crappy battered buffalo wings or efficient service.
Click to expand...
it's because of the withe socks the waitresses are wearing :cringe:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom