Superior in what way? Historically, liberal civics are a very recent experiment (last 2-3 centuries?) by majority ethnic European countries. Around 1900, ethnic Europeans formed about a third of the world's population. Mid 20th century they were down to 25%, around 2000 they were down to 14% , a percentage that is still dropping. If current demographic trends continue, at the start of the 22nd century, ethnic Europeans will form roughly (order of magnitude) about 1% of the world's population, i.e. "game over" if a new world war would break out. Muslims formed 12% of the world's population in 1900, are currently at 23% and are expected to grow to a third of the world's population in 2100.
So tell me how liberal civics are "superior" when the ethnic European civs are rapidly losing "the game" in real life and muslim civs are rapidly winning despite being behind in tech? Thanks to the " rights" given to muslims by European nations, and unrestrained migration, many European cities will flip control to islamic and African civs during the 21th century, while many USA cities will flip to Latin American civs.
What a sad view of the world as competing "players". Civ is a game, humanity is not.