No. I'm willing to hit military targets. If those targets are using human shields, that sucks, but there is a responsibility to protect the lives of people other than the meat shields. If some guy is holding a baby and firing into a crowd, you shoot the guy at the risk of injuring the child because you have a responsibility to protect more than just the meat shield. Accept what? That killing children will be required to neutralize the rocket attacks by Hamas. Yea, I accept it. Collateral damage sucks but there is little one can do when the enemy targets children and uses children as meat shields. All one can do is limit the damage, and collateral damage is less damage than allowing terrrorism to win and continue. I was in the army, now I'm a civilian. Do you understand the definition? Now my point is not moot. Care to try again?