John McCain on Katrina - "Never Again"

[Sharwood]

Things are not always what they appear.

And your post didn't appear sarcastic. Just assholic. Kind of like many of your other posts to multiple other people. Which leads me to believe this is one of the few activities in life that gives you a self-esteem boost. So whether you're sarcastic or deadly serious either way you're not serious to me.

Fascinating. This does boost my self-esteem, but so do most of the things I do with my time. I see no point doing things I don't enjoy. Would it help if I posted more annoying smilies after everything I said?

It is obvious you don't actually read my posts, because I never treat anyone like an arse unless they thoroughly deserve it, such as Swedishguy and AL_DA_GREAT.
Moderator Action: Trolling - warned.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[bigdog5994]

i really wish McCain was president instead of Bush, never again will we vote for a "normal kinda guy" candidate

 

[BasketCase]

In six months you'll have your wish. Then we'll find out if you wished well or poorly.

 

[Narz]

i really wish McCain was president instead of Bush, never again will we vote for a "normal kinda guy" candidate

Lolz, you got marketed.

 

[Berzerker]

....And you continue to misunderstand, and persist in believing that you did. Whatever Berzerker - it's really not worth continuing to talk about.

was it really worth starting?

 

[bigdog5994]

Lolz, you got marketed.

huh? what does that mean Tony

 

[Sharwood]

huh? what does that mean Tony

You fell for a marketing ploy. Bush was pushed as a normal guy, and you voted for him because of that.

 

[Cutlass]

Bush was never a normal guy. His blood is as blue as any English lordling.

 

[Archbob]

Since I did not immediately go to NO and pull people out of the water after Katrina, I can't fault John McCain for not doing so either.

 

[JollyRoger]

Since I did not immediately go to NO and pull people out of the water after Katrina, I can't fault John McCain for not doing so either.

And since McCain did not immediately go to NO and pull people out of the water after Katrina, he can't fault W for not doing so either.

 

[MobBoss]

And since McCain did not immediately go to NO and pull people out of the water after Katrina, he can't fault W for not doing so either.

And since JollyRoger did not immediately go to NO and pull people out of the water after Katrina, he can't fault W (or anyone else for that matter) for not doing so either.

Fixxed it for you.

 

[JollyRoger]

And since JollyRoger did not immediately go to NO and pull people out of the water after Katrina, he can't fault W (or anyone else for that matter) for not doing so either.

Fixxed it for you.

Except that I made it to NO ahead of both McCain and Bush.

 

[MobBoss]

Except that I made it to NO ahead of both McCain and Bush.

Heresay.....

 

[FriendlyFire]

And since JollyRoger did not immediately go to NO and pull people out of the water after Katrina, he can't fault W (or anyone else for that matter) for not doing so either.

Fixxed it for you.

Yes its JollyRoger has a legal responsibilty which comes with being the president of the United States.

Fixxed it for you

 

[MobBoss]

Yes its JollyRoger has a legal responsibilty which comes with being the president of the United States.

Fixxed it for you

Jolly mentioned McCain....not the President.

No charge for the fix.

 

[emzie]

EDIT: Oh, and to really put it into context...the actual report: http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/images/06/14/gao.06.844t.pdf

So, roughly 84% of the money went to legit purchaces (food, medical housing)? That's not horrible.

 

[FriendlyFire]

Jolly mentioned McCain....not the President.

No charge for the fix.

Mobboss mentioned W .... not McCain
No charge for the fix

 

[ainwood]

Moderator Action: With all the big fuss about "fixed it for you", I would expect people not to be hypocritical (and I'm talking substance over form here).

So stop it, and argue the points in a constructive manner.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[MobBoss]

So, roughly 84% of the money went to legit purchaces (food, medical housing)? That's not horrible.

Actually, yes...losing 16% + or - is pretty darn horrible. Very horrible.

If your bank simply told you they routinely lost 16% of your money.....would you be upset? Or would you say 'oh, ok...thats not horrible'.

 

[ainwood]

Moderator Action: Reading this a little more thoroughly, it looks like its a troll thread (no link even), and then we get trolling & flaming all the way through it.

As such: Closed.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889