Have you read the article or is this just a random attack on prostitutes?
It would be highly ironical though if the breakthrough in the vacine for a disease initially portrayed as a "sinner's disease" affecting prostitute, gays and drug users came from studying African prostitutes
It sounds too good to be true, though. I'll expect this to be a false hope until they have serious results - hopes of a cure or vacine for AIDS have been dashed too often for me to be very hopeful
concedering that the moajority of peoplep who posted in the threadm your point in rather voided isnt it- unless they know about it (the news) it is news to them
I've thought for years that a cure or vaccine for HIV -- even a better understanding of how it works --- was a lot more likely to come from observing natural resistance to it and deducing how it works than from experiments with drug cocktails.
I am a little surprised it has been so long in coming ... but given the infection rates in Africa today, in just a few years we're going to see trends like this ever more clearly, as the resistant "stand out" more and more against the background of so many dying.
What I want to know, is why a search for people with a natural resistance to the virus was not a higher priority in the earlier days of AIDS research. This should have been found ten years ago, if people had been looking the right places.
Indeed this is old news Stalin. This was BIG news also about a year ago. It turned out that a few prostitutes were resistant to the virus. Nothing special really, there are always certain percentages in the population that are resistant to a virus.
Further on it's not a big step in the direction of a vaccine to HIV, as said in the article the women don't produce antibodies but they have CTLs primed for HIV. So in order to make somebody resistant to HIV you have to take out CTLs, prime them for HIV and then put them back. Very costly...
So, while this is an interesting finding I really doubt whether this will help the general public at all. It merely sounds like a cry for attention from the Kenya's AIDS Control Program to get more money.
Science revolves about getting lots of attention for your research and getting people interested in order to get more money.
I've thought for years that a cure or vaccine for HIV -- even a better understanding of how it works --- was a lot more likely to come from observing natural resistance to it and deducing how it works than from experiments with drug cocktails.
Why do you think they haven't been doing this for years? You think drug coctails are random mixes of medicines? The problem is that it has taken this long for patterns of resistance/immunity to emerge. The discovery that some resistance was due to a defect in one or both of the receptors that HIV uses to attack cells led to a whole new line of treatments that block those receptors in normal people. It's not like scientists sat around on that discovery.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.