Wait a second... I have a big beef with some of these leader trait changes. The big one is for the Ameircans: Why in the Heck is Washington charismatic and FDR organized? Shouldn't it be the other way around? There was nothing organized about the New Deal. Roosevelt was just guessing. And he was far more charismatic than was Washington. Second, why all the changes for leaders from what set of charicteristics that already existed, to another set of traits that already existed? Both of these reak to me like attempts to better balance the game. That should not be the criteria for picking leader traits... the acctual traits of the leaders should be. Anyway, everything looks great, but for this one problem. We are not amused.