danjuno
Cole Phelps, Badge 1247
The percentage may or may not be significant, but it tracks that Trans rights are the biggest issue.

I know this isn't a discussion thread, but out of curiosity I've skimmed back through this thread to get an idea of what the focus actually is. Despite being called the LGBTQ News thread, I've only been able to find about 9 out of 219 posts that are news stories, or discussing news stories, related to the non-T part of that. That's about 4% of the posts.
Possibly that can be explained away by that being the "hot topic", with various legal cases and things raised throughout the year, but even so that's still a remarkable ratio... right? I can't imagine that all issues and challenges related to the "LGB" part have vanished to such an extent as to only warrant a few mentions here and there in what is nominally a dedicated thread to such matters. I'm not a card-carrying member of the LGB Alliance or whatever, but that seems to be a noteworthy imbalance.
If you ask why certain kinds of articles aren't being posted but then don't post any yourself, then yeah, people are going to be annoyed with you.How pleasant
Literally I have no idea what you're getting atHow pleasant
Well that's a very odd standard to be adhering too. In any case, I wasn't asking why any specific things weren't being posted, but I thought the balance or ratio was quite notable. If you don't find it interesting then fair enough.If you ask why certain kinds of articles aren't being posted but then don't post any yourself, then yeah, people are going to be annoyed with you.
Well you've basically said that I should have no reason to take any interest in things that don't personally affect me, so I'll take that under advisement. I'm sure at some point in the not too distant future I'll be expected to do the opposite, but I'll just refer back to this when that happens. Thanks for your advice.Literally I have no idea what you're getting at
You cannot be surprised that most of the discussion and news is about the section of the queer community which the two largest anglophone countries have been actively trying to destroy.I know this isn't a discussion thread, but out of curiosity I've skimmed back through this thread to get an idea of what the focus actually is. Despite being called the LGBTQ News thread, I've only been able to find about 9 out of 219 posts that are news stories, or discussing news stories, related to the non-T part of that. That's about 4% of the posts.
Possibly that can be explained away by that being the "hot topic", with various legal cases and things raised throughout the year, but even so that's still a remarkable ratio... right? I can't imagine that all issues and challenges related to the "LGB" part have vanished to such an extent as to only warrant a few mentions here and there in what is nominally a dedicated thread to such matters. I'm not a card-carrying member of the LGB Alliance or whatever, but that seems to be a noteworthy imbalance.
Well that's a very odd standard to be adhering too. In any case, I wasn't asking why any specific things weren't being posted, but I thought the balance or ratio was quite notable. If you don't find it interesting then fair enough.
Well you've basically said that I should have no reason to take any interest in things that don't personally affect me, so I'll take that under advisement. I'm sure at some point in the not too distant future I'll be expected to do the opposite, but I'll just refer back to this when that happens. Thanks for your advice.
Framing aside, no. As I said:You cannot be surprised that most of the discussion and news is about the section of the queer community which the two largest anglophone countries have been actively trying to destroy.
So I'm not surprised it dominates the thread, my surprise was that it's very close to being the exclusive topic.Possibly that can be explained away by that being the "hot topic", with various legal cases and things raised throughout the year, but even so that's still a remarkable ratio... right?
The concept of deciding to be interested in something doesn't really resonate with me I'm afraid. It wasn't a conscious decision to have a curiosity. I also can't see what the mystery is as to why such a proportion would be inherently noteworthy. I mean, if there was a thread called "General Pet Discussions" and you had a look and it was 95% about terrapins across a dozen pages, I don't think anyone would demand that you justify why you found that noteworthy, or state that you weren't allowed to say you did unless you were willing to actively start posting about hamsters.Again, like, why do you find it interesting enough to write a post about it, what made you decide you cared enough to try to find what the percentage was, if you're not interested enough to share any news items yourself.
www.scotusblog.com
Not sure what you refer to with "obscure factoid", or even which definition of factoid you're using.Pets aren't a major political issue right now. You brought up a rather obscure factoid concerning coverage of a political issue, so it's completely natural that people are assuming you're trying to make some sort of point.
![]()
Court to consider whether to hear challenge to same-sex marriage on Nov. 7
The court is scheduled to consider whether to hear Kim Davis’ challenge to same-sex marriage at their private conference on Friday, Nov. 7. As a general practice, the court does […]www.scotusblog.com
If the Supreme Court agrees to hear this case, we may soon be talking about the LG members of the LGBTQ community.
Could have fooled meI'm not a card-carrying member of the LGB Alliance or whatever, but that seems to be a noteworthy imbalance.