TheMeInTeam
If A implies B...
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2008
- Messages
- 27,989
How can you have a "randomised control trial" for sex reassignment surgery??
quite easily. all you have to do is completely abandon ethics, grab the sample populations you need, and start doing surgeries.
(i'm not actually suggesting this btw, sometimes people here seem to get the wrong idea).
Can we not pretend like these people have the principle of good science on their side? Thanks.
roughly as well as we can not pretend anybody here does in most cases.
how many times have we seen similar rationale/data from the government (or worse) taken as gospel/given as evidence? a certain thread about a certain disease comes to mind, where it apparently stopped being kosher to use a word even though the government itself used that word in that context.
when one agrees with the government's statement, it's "evidence". when one doesn't, apparently the state not insuring something is literally attacking people or something and somehow not meeting exactly the evidential burden that was perfectly fine when talking about the other topic which was more agreeable.
again, i state that in general, "trust the government" is bad default practice. and when you allow for bad process for things you agree with, that process can and inevitably will result in outcomes you disagree with using the same standards. that's why bad process is bad.
Moderator Action: Please no trolling.
Last edited by a moderator: