Ziggy Stardust
Absolutely Sane
And people wonder why I give a happy thumbsup to England.
Spoiler :
Mainly because of Top Gear to be honest
And people wonder why I give a happy thumbsup to England.
It's our greatest export! Some countries have electronics, some have precious metals... We have Jeremy Clarkson.And people wonder why I give a happy thumbsup to England.
Spoiler :Mainly because of Top Gear to be honest![]()
No, I'm talking about these Guardian Angels. You don't know what's goin' down on the streets!

United Kingdom
In London the Guardian Angels have been active since 1989, however, by 2007 they have become a very small group of around 12 and with very little activity. In Britain, the law requires citizens acting in self-defence to use "reasonable force", which leads to Guardian Angel training to centre on using the minimum possible force, and to only use force to prevent a dangerous situation from escalating. All violent crimes are reported to the police, and intervention leading to citizens' arrests (legal in Britain) or use of force is only employed in extreme cases.[5]
Their presence in London was highly controversial in the first decade of existence, press articles having likened their actions to vigilantism. In 1989, discussion in Parliament raised the possibility of American members of the Guardian Angels being deported owing to their presence being "not conducive to the public good" but this was rejected.[6]
It's highly likely that there is more to this case than the Daily Mail is presenting (given their track record for reporting...).That is all well and good. In the meantime, until the new laws come into effect, does your Prime Minister or some other government official have the power of pardon if the guy somehow ends up getting sent to the slammer over this?
It was self-defense. I don't even see how he needs to say it was a citizen's arrest, when the guy punched him in the face first.
You don't know that what is presented in the article is all that happened.It was self-defense. I don't even see how he needs to say it was a citizen's arrest, when the guy punched him in the face first.
There were witnesses.You don't know that what is presented in the article is all that happened.
I agree that, based on the defendent's accounts, he is innocent.........
But based on any defendent's accounts, he is innocent........
When conducting a citizen's arrst in the UK, the detainee has to be told they are under citizen's arrest, otherwise the law will likely view it as illegal detention.It was self-defense. I don't even see how he needs to say it was a citizen's arrest, when the guy punched him in the face first.
Clearly ENGLAND NEEDS FIREARMS
Yes. At the very least thier police do. Take baby steps first, then arm the populace.
Indeed. I got my first gun when I was 11 or 12 (well, actual firearm. I got an air rifle long before that.) Armed children rock.


Holding someone down forcibly is depriving them of their freedom and is an arrest. It does not matter what was done to you, you still need to inform them that they're being arrested and what for otherwise it's an unlawful arrest.
When conducting a citizen's arrst in the UK, the detainee has to be told they are under citizen's arrest, otherwise the law will likely view it as illegal detention.
A crippled man was defending himself against an attacker, and he ends up being charged with assault while the criminal is set free? What's wrong with this picture?