Well, Dolbster rated you at the very bottom of his list and you didn't respond to that, unless of course we consider NKs as responses. I started my little "let's examine why Dolbster got NKed" discussion with a quote of that list, then threw in a quote of him outright saying he wouldn't mind seeing you lynched, and you just ignored the whole conversation until I outright dragged you into it. It seemed to me that you were hoping the whole NK motivations concept would be dispatched without your position in it ever having to be acknowledged.
Why would I respond to him putting me at the bottom of his day 1 readlist? From what I remember he never actually explained why, just said I was suspicious and would vote for me, correct me if I'm wrong on this. Which I'm used to because it happens constantly, just from how I play. If you want take Dolbster's readlist as correct then by all means go ahead. I'm not going to delve down the rabbit hole that is conjecture about nk motivations, because I personally don't think it's worth the investment.