caketastydelish
Deity
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2008
- Messages
- 10,026
You don't have a defenseless family in the country, potentially being murdered. I do.
While I criticize U.S. foreign policy on a regular basis (both on cfc and elsewhere) I think that attitude is missing the point. The people of Iran don’t have the luxury of worrying about how their government affects things in other parts of the world. Their immediate problem is an oppressive regime who has made their lives miserable. Suicide rates in Iran over the past year or so have skyrocketed because of how awful it is to live there, and mismanagement from the government caused this mess. From their oppression of women and lbgt people to the awful economy and water shortage. That U.S. foreign policy is bad hardly makes this regime the heroes.
edit: it would be like approving of Stalin because he's enemies with Hitler.
I don't think this is necessarily set in stone, civil wars aren't the only method by which mass protests cause substantial political change. Sometimes there's enough elite and military defections to make it a fait accompli.Have to feel bad for the Iranians, risking their lives (and evidently paying with their lives) to oppose an admittedly terrible regime, but what they're fighting for is to turn their country into, at best, a second Syria, more likely a second Libya.
I don't think this is necessarily set in stone, civil wars aren't the only method by which mass protests cause substantial political change. Sometimes there's enough elite and military defections to make it a fait accompli.
if anyone thinks the US and Israel are going to allow a stable, sovereign and democratic Iran to emerge, please share the drugs you're using with me.
I can't find proof the protests are losing steam. But I've heard the protestors are explicitly asking Trump for help, which has changed my opinion even more that the US needs a military response.Here is the latest I could find.
It seems the protests are losing steam as the authorities crack down with bullets.
Here is the latest I could find.
It seems the protests are losing steam as the authorities crack down with bullets.
Hundreds dead.
Probably a lot more.
![]()
Iran protests: Eyewitnesses describe deadly crackdown across country
The BBC has received eyewitness accounts of security forces attacking anti-government protesters across the country.www.bbc.com
BBC said:A source in Rasht told BBC Persian that 70 bodies of protesters were transferred to a hospital mortuary in the city on Thursday. According to the source, security forces demanded "payment for bullets" before releasing bodies to families.
Who would the US support? Who has stood out with a vision of what a post-ayatollah would look like? Reza Pahlavi isn't even in the country...I can't find proof the protests are losing steam. But I've heard the protestors are explicitly asking Trump for help, which has changed my opinion even more that the US needs a military response.
I don't think the US will intervene. Too risky, no sure victory; Not enough immediate "Trump is King" response.
The assumption that these are mutually exclusive is a huge leap here. The expressed democratic will of plenty of countries populations will be thoroughly anti Israel, especially in this part of the world.Why wouldn't Israel want a democratic Iran to emerge? It would be better than the Hamas supporting one.
"Nothings off the table." is just Trump's newest go to line. Previously he enjoyed saying: In two weeks...He intervened past summer. Nothings off the table.
It's a mountainous country the size of Queensland, 3x the size of Texas or Ukraine, with 90 million people. Not the sort of place even the US can "just intervene" in.I don't think the US will intervene. Too risky, no sure victory; Not enough immediate "Trump is King" response.
Exactly and size is only the background of the problem. Bombing alone won't do it.It's a mountainous country the size of Queensland, 3x the size of Texas or Ukraine, with 90 million people. Not the sort of place even the US can "just intervene" in.
Any sort of war would be a serious, bloody undertaking.