Massive Cheating Scandal Rocks Atlanta Schools

What should be done to prevent scandals like this?


  • Total voters
    55

downtown

Crafternoon Delight
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
19,541
Location
Chicago
The article is a little long, so I'm only posting half of it, but I'd encourage y'all to read the full thing.

AJC said:
Across Atlanta Public Schools, staff worked feverishly in secret to transform testing failures into successes.


Teachers and principals erased and corrected mistakes on students’ answer sheets.

Area superintendents silenced whistle-blowers and rewarded subordinates who met academic goals by any means possible.

Superintendent Beverly Hall and her top aides ignored, buried, destroyed or altered complaints about misconduct, claimed ignorance of wrongdoing and accused naysayers of failing to believe in poor children’s ability to learn.


For years — as long as a decade — this was how the Atlanta school district produced gains on state curriculum tests. The scores soared so dramatically they brought national acclaim to Hall and the district, according to an investigative report released Tuesday by Gov. Nathan Deal.

In the report, the governor’s special investigators describe an enterprise where unethical — and potentially illegal — behavior pierced every level of the bureaucracy, allowing district staff to reap praise and sometimes bonuses by misleading the children, parents and community they served.

The report accuses top district officials of wrongdoing that could lead to criminal charges in some cases.

The decision whether to prosecute lies with three district attorneys — in Fulton, DeKalb and Douglas counties — who will consider potential offenses in their jurisdictions.

For teachers, a culture of fear ensured the deception would continue.

“APS is run like the mob,” one teacher told investigators, saying she cheated because she feared retaliation if she didn’t.

The voluminous report names 178 educators, including 38 principals, as participants in cheating. More than 80 confessed. The investigators said they confirmed cheating in 44 of 56 schools they examined.

The investigators conducted more than 2,100 interviews and examined more than 800,000 documents in what is likely the most wide-ranging investigation into test-cheating in a public school district ever conducted in United States history.

The findings fly in the face of years of denials from Atlanta administrators. The investigators re-examined the state’s erasure analysis — which they said proved to be valid and reliable — and sought to lay to rest district leaders’ numerous excuses for the suspicious scores.

Deal warned Tuesday “there will be consequences” for educators who cheated. “The report’s findings are troubling,” he said, “but I am encouraged this investigation will bring closure to problems that existed.”

Interim Atlanta Superintendent Erroll Davis promised that the educators found to have cheated “are not going to be put in front of children again.”

Through her lawyer, Hall issued a statement denying that she, her staff or the “vast majority” of Atlanta educators knew or should have known of “allegedly widespread” cheating. “She further denies any other allegations of knowing and deliberate wrongdoing on her part or on the part of her senior staff,” the statement said, “whether during the course of the investigation or before.”

Don’t blame teachers?

Phyllis Brown, a southwest Atlanta parent with two children in the district, said the latest revelations are “horrible.” It is the children, she said, who face embarrassment if they are promoted to a higher grade only to find they aren’t ready for the more challenging work.

Still, she doesn’t believe teachers should be punished.

“It’s the people over them, that threatened them, that should be punished,” she said. “The ones from the building downtown, they should lose their jobs, they should lose their pensions. They are the ones who started this.”

AJC raised questions

Former Gov. Sonny Perdue ordered the inquiry last year after rejecting the district’s own investigation into suspicious erasures on tests in 58 schools. The AJC first raised questions about some schools’ test scores more than two years ago.

The special investigators’ report describes years of misconduct that took place as far up the chain of command as the superintendent’s office. The report accuses Hall and her aides of repeatedly tampering with or hiding records that cast an unflattering light on the district.

In one case, Hall’s chief Human Resources officer Millicent Few “illegally ordered” the destruction of early, damning drafts of an outside lawyer’s investigation of test-tampering at Atlanta’s Deerwood Academy, the report said.

Another time, Few ordered staff to destroy a case log of cheating-related internal investigations after The Atlanta Journal-Constitution requested it, the report said. Few told staff to replace the old log with a new, altered version. When the district finally produced the complaints, the investigators wrote, it illegally withheld cases that made it “look bad” — either because its investigation was poor or because wrongdoing received minimal sanction.

Few also made false statements to the investigators, the report said.

Few, who could not be reached for comment Tuesday, denied to the investigators that she tampered with documents or ordered anyone else to do so.

Lying to investigators and destroying or altering public records are felonies under Georgia law with a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.

Deputy Superintendent Kathy Augustine, as well as area superintendents Michael Pitts and Tamara Cotman, also gave the investigators false information, the report said, and the district’s general counsel Veleter Mazyck “provided less than candid responses.”

The report also said Hall and Augustine illegally suppressed a report by a testing expert last year. Andrew Porter, dean of the University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education, largely confirmed an AJC analysis that suggested cheating occurred, but the district withheld his findings from the media and public.

Augustine, Pitts and Cotman could not be reached Tuesday. Mazyck referred questions to her attorney. “I’m shocked that they would characterize her statements as less than candid,” said Richard Sinkfield, Mazyck’s attorney. “She was fully cooperative, fully open, and has not participated in any wrongdoing.”

The investigators said district officials misled them and hampered their investigation.

“Dr. Hall pledged ‘full cooperation’ with this investigation, but did not deliver,” the report said. “APS withheld documents and information from us. Many district officials we interviewed were not truthful.”

http://www.ajc.com/news/investigation-into-aps-cheating-1001375.html

The full article details "Cheating Parties", where teachers would gather together at homes to change scores, and Principals threatening lawsuits or dismissals if teachers failed to falsify data. This is one of the largest US cheating scandals in US History, or at least, recent memory. Washington DC, another "model" district, was also caught in a large scale cheating scandal this year, albeit not nearly this big.

What does this mean? Clearly, the ed data from Georgia from the last few years is shot to hell. Some current ed-reform skeptics are pointing to this as a reason to not use test scores so prominently in merit-pay or school funding choices, as it increases the incentive to cheat. Other say this is just a case of a few serious bad apples getting together, without proper oversight. What are your thoughts?
 
How often does this happen? Insight for the foreigner?
 
Wow...just wow...

It seems that some school districts are totally uninteresting in actually educating their students. That just awful. I agree with the notion that test scores are not a good measure of student achievement, since it leads to scandals like this and a crappier educational environment; teachers are teaching to the test when they should just be teaching. This also brings down whatever little dignity teachers had. Now teachers are just sheep being herded around by the superintendents, doing their bidding.

I also won't be surprised if more of these kind of scandals start climbing out of the woodwork.
 
Why should school districts be interested in educating students when the only incentive is to get them to pass tests?
 
This is basically the same thing as grade inflation at top highschools to abuse scholarships.
 
I don't think we should hurt the teachers because remember the Milgram experiment?
 
How often does this happen? Insight for the foreigner?
A testing scandal of this scope (over 100 teachers and admins, and possibly up to the Superintendent level) is pretty unprecedented. Testing fraud flagrant enough to make a statistically significant impact on a district's overall scores isn't very common, although I suspect various forms of test-breaking protocol isn't very rare.
This is basically the same thing as grade inflation at top highschools to abuse scholarships.

Yeah, I agree...different incentives (angry parents and the prestige of elite colleges vs merit pay and pressure from the state and uncle sam), but similar results.
 
This also brings down whatever little dignity teachers had. Now teachers are just sheep being herded around by the superintendents, doing their bidding.
That's certainly a big part of it; when teachers aren't actually allowed to be educators, but turned into assembly-line workers trying to reach imposed quotas, what do you expect to happen?
 
I give any teacher the default understanding that they putting their best effort out to educate their students and are capable of doing so, unless proven otherwise. In this particular case, teachers cheating on exams =/= teachers not adequately educating their students, so I would be very careful about mass firings at the classroom level. However, it is a complete failure on the part of educational administrators and I would be going at them with a pretty big broom.
 
A testing scandal of this scope (over 100 teachers and admins, and possibly up to the Superintendent level) is pretty unprecedented.

Yep. Though there are other ways to sort of game the system. Mis-report drop outs, for example. Or have the state run it's own benchmark program. IIRC both were implicated in the "Texas Miracle", which pretty directly led to the NCLB act... which is likely much of the reason for the Atlanta scandal.

In this particular case, teachers cheating on exams =/= teachers not adequately educating their students

I think that's a really good point. Both with this cheating and the Miracle the desire to inflate school ratings (and thus funding. Or at least Admin. salaries) was probably the main factor. Not a desire to skimp on education. Though if nobody knows what's really going on it's easier to get away with poor educating.
 
There really is no excuse not to have district level, uniform oversight over major standardized testing. That's the best answer, though revising the purpose, pressures, and frequency of these tests may help.

But basically, don't allow teachers to administrate with full responsibility state-wide standardized tests to their own students. Someone else has to come in and preferably proctor but at the very least pick up the tests the same day. Understandably this may be more expensive and that's why it might not be done as was common for me as a student, but it still should be done. Obviously there were breakdowns at the adminstrative level here which allowed such cheating but a strict system with someone from the district coming in to each school on testing day will prevent individual teachers from disgraceful stuff like bringing tests home to change the bubble answers. (Plus it would be much more comfortable to have immediate firings and criminal penalties with such roles. If someone from district admin has their entire job during testing season to come in to oversee standardized testing and they screw up, penalties galore, and their higher ups too if there's responsibility there, not the same as a teacher overseeing and collecting the tests and cheating for their own students)
 
Meaning: Your support of education shouldn't depend on your ideology. It depends on whether you want to see humanity advance or not.
Oh get off your high horse dude. Views on education are every bit based on someone's ideological leanings.

I'd also like to ask you to explain TF's comments "slapped me in the face".
:crazyeye: You guys take everything like maximum serious.
 
Can't they use short answer questions?
 
Top Bottom