1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Mercantilism vs Free market

Discussion in 'Civ4 - Strategy & Tips' started by Priah, Apr 19, 2008.

  1. Priah

    Priah Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    154
    Obiviously Mercantlislm with representation is pretty powerful. But without representation, which one is superior?
     
  2. futurehermit

    futurehermit Chieftain

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    5,720
    It depends what you want to do. Are you running a SE empire-wide? Do you have contact with overseas civs and lucrative trade routes? Are the other AIs in mercantilism? Are you running corporations? Do you want to deny AIs trade route access?

    They are both powerful when used properly. Mercantilism also has the added bonus that it is available a bit earlier.
     
  3. Nares

    Nares Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,631
    The answer?

    It depends.

    With mid/large sized cities and intercontinental trade, I'd say FM wins. But I feel it requires an inordinate investment for the return, and offers little to nothing earlier in the game.

    Trade routes are a more extreme version of Cottage development, IMO, with the "more extreme" coming in the form of "no growth for a long, long time."

    You would need to research trade routes to reach a more definitive conclusion. I know they're beneficial inversely with city size; small favors Merc, big FM. But obviously, if you can't land intercontinental (or trans-water) foreign trade routes with a long time ally, I'd say Mec is better.
     
  4. Priah

    Priah Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    154
    Probably should have asked the question better, but in a situation where its a flat earth, no water whatsoever, will mercantilism come out ahead if all your cities are sitting around 12 - 14 pop, and late middle age tech levels.
     
  5. Nares

    Nares Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,631
    Try this post for more information on trade routes.
     
  6. Iranon

    Iranon Deity Whipping Boy

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,214
    Location:
    Germany
    I like Mercantilism in the midgame. Trade routes are symetrical, and a free specialist with the Sistine Chapel is quite nice to get new acquisitions up to scratch.

    It's less appealing in the lategame though... Free Market is more attractive with corporations, State Property (or Biology, in a very hilly map) without.
     
  7. Ibian

    Ibian Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2007
    Messages:
    850
    Run one of them. Save. Run the other. Reload or not depending on result.
     
  8. Nares

    Nares Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,631
    Also, I think a lot of players fail to use Mercantilism properly, and ultimately base their opinion on which to run based on what effect it has on their net cash flow under each civic at their current slider settings.

    Of course FM looks superior when you've mismanaged which specialists you're running.
     
  9. BalbanesBeoulve

    BalbanesBeoulve Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,060
    If you have foreign trades routes available free market is pretty much always better. Even with representation it slaughters mercantilism the majority of the time. The only good time to use it is if everybody else is running it, or everybody hates you and you can't get open borders.
     
  10. slaze

    slaze Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    california
    The ratio is about 3 :commerce:+GPP : 4.25 :commerce:. At least at baseline.

    But this baseline assumes so much, and the ratio could actually go down to 3 :commerce:+GPP : 1 :commerce:,
    as having no open borders would only net you one more domestic trade route w/ Free Market. But trade routes are kind of tricky, they start at 1, they floor, and they have their host of multipliers. And you have to have alot of them; at Free Market, with +1 trade routes, you'd need as many foreign cities as you trade routes - three times as many foreign cities to hold the above ratio. With four trade routes per city you'd need 4x cities to have the above ratio. Often it is very hard to get open borders with 3 and 4 times as many cities as you own.

    But the 4.25x can grow just as well. A harbor, etc, affects the trade routes and the population of foreign cities is a big factor. Foreign cities with pop 1 up to pop 10 have a 1x multiplier, but for each pop growth beyond that you get 10%. So, pop 11 gets a 1.1x multiplier, pop 12 gets a 1.2x multiplier and so on, up to pop twenty being double and pop 30 being triple. So the state of the world has a big affect. If all foreign cities were pop 20 the ratio would be 3 :commerce:+GPP : 8.5 :commerce:

    But then Rep in this situation would make the ratio 6 :commerce:+GPP : 8.5 :commerce:
     
  11. vicawoo

    vicawoo Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,226
    Well, if everyone is running mercantalism, there's little point not to yourself. Also, sometimes if you'd rather slow everyones tech rate down and/or you're very large, mercantilism is better. Or if you're running pacificism and trying to power to the next great person.
     
  12. slaze

    slaze Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    california
    Yes. Even if you have open borders with a civ equal in city size than you the ratio is still just 3 :commerce:+GPP : 2.5 :commerce:,
    assuming no harbors and no pop 11+ cities.

    I guess it's some point into the second civ where Free Market is profitable.

    And as far as the GPP are concerned, they should only be viewed as a benefit to the NE city (one city). The rest are worthless. And by then it takes alot more than a Mercantile specialist to make a GP
     
  13. Nares

    Nares Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,631
    Not at all.

    GPP MM suggests that three cities make for the maximum GP generation. I can't search for the thread at the moment.

    Also, isn't 2.5 commerce rounded down to 2? I know beakers and culture are now calculated to the second decimal place, but I'm unaware if that's true for commerce as well.
     
  14. aelf

    aelf Noctis Lucis Caelum

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    15,701
    Location:
    Kate Spade oligarchy
    No. Mercantilism could still rock in the late game pre-corps (Warlords and vanilla). 20+ cities with a free specialist each is very good. Post-corp, I'm not so sure.
     
  15. BalbanesBeoulve

    BalbanesBeoulve Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,060
    Anyway, the real winner is state property.
     
  16. aelf

    aelf Noctis Lucis Caelum

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    15,701
    Location:
    Kate Spade oligarchy
    Not true as well. I've seen my research drop at least once when I switch to SP. The only advantage I got was having more money in the treasury.
     
  17. TheMeInTeam

    TheMeInTeam GiftOfNukes

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    21,976
    Location:
    Orlando
    Building on this, I'd say merc is best when:

    1. You're warring with minimal useful trade partners anyway. Might as well get something, then.
    2. You have vassals. Merc allows trade with vassals, taking away one of its more crippling effects very quickly if you have any.
    3. Isolation (obviously)

    Generally I see it as a "warmonger game" civic, because while inferior to free market when there are trade routes, in games where you war a lot you usually don't have enough viable trade routes anyway, and if you do they're often vassals :evil:.
     
  18. Airefuego

    Airefuego Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    704
    Location:
    Australia / Chile
    In some circs Merc can be a good strangler when you're big and the others aren't - why help them with lucrative trade routes?

    - and if you are running Rep and have SoLiberty... :D :D :D
     
  19. TheMeInTeam

    TheMeInTeam GiftOfNukes

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    21,976
    Location:
    Orlando
    That's a very good point. Merc DOES hurt other civs too in terms of trade routes, not just your own! It's starting to seem a lot stronger when one's civ is sufficiently large.
     
  20. OTAKUjbski

    OTAKUjbski TK421

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,511
    Location:
    not at my post
    As with most things in Civ4, it depends.

    The easiest way to tell is:

    Hit F4 and look at the 'Info' Screen. Count up the total amount of :commerce: you're receiving in trade from non-Vassals and make note of it. This is the 'benefit' of your foreign trade routes.

    Then hit F1 and count the total number of cities you have. If not running Representation, multiply that number by 3. If you are or will be running Representation, multiply that number by 6. Make note of the result. This is the expected 'benefit' of Mercantilism [+Representation].

    Compare the two numbers. In most cases, if the Merc value is comparable to or even slightly below the :traderoute: value, it's worth it to keep Free Market.

    NOTE: If you're not running Free Market [or Mercantilism] when you do this calculation, count up the number of trade routes you have in your cities (not the commerce value ... just the number of how many you have). Add 1 to that number and then divide by the original number [of traderoutes] (i.e., num_traderoutes + 1 / num_traderoutes) ... the number should be greater than 1 (like 1.2 or something). You can then guesstimate the amount of increase to your trade routes by taking the total amount of :commerce: from traderoutes including vassals (from the F4 Info screen) and multiplying it by the other number you just got. The result is usually close to the amount of increase you get from Free Market. (I hope that made sense...)
     

Share This Page