Michael Moore wants best picture Oscar

Status
Not open for further replies.
what?

hes calling you a Loser?

i think hes pretty funny, havent seen the new movie, but i did see the bowling for columbine one, and it was good, but from the hype i had expected more, longer movie and maybe funnier

i did see his first movie, Roger and me, and thats his best movie,hands down

really funny
 
He's calling everyone a loser who plopped down $7.50 for vitriol and innuendo that they could easily get free from the New Republic or a myriad of other internet liberal spamfest sites. But actually, and correct me if I'm wrong cause I Am an old fart, but.. when one holds that symbol up over one's forehead like that, isn't one making the universal, "I'm a Loser" sign? ;)

-Elgalad
 
Who are the idiots who acctually pay the money to see this movie and take it seriously. This shows how messed up the awards are. The judges can't even decide what movies are good and what are bad.
 
Elgalad said:
He's calling everyone a loser who plopped down $7.50 for vitriol and innuendo that they could easily get free from the New Republic or a myriad of other internet liberal spamfest sites. But actually, and correct me if I'm wrong cause I Am an old fart, but.. when one holds that symbol up over one's forehead like that, isn't one making the universal, "I'm a Loser" sign? ;)

-Elgalad

no, are you kidding me?

who would call himself a loser?

thats how you call other people a loser

ps. from your avatar id say youre beyond old dude, youre ancient :p
 
Moss321 said:
Really, I always thought Hollywood was a liberal haven? :confused:

Obviously you know little about the scheme of things.

Who made most of the USA's propaganda in the world wars?
 
While I care not about the rotund documentary-maker myself:

I find it amusing that most people bleat out the same reaction to Moore, finding it
easier to amgrily dismiss him, rather than accept there might be real problems in the US.
 
If it does win best picture, then it'll be time to revive the House Un-American Activities Committee. :1disgust:
 
Jawz II said:
ps. from your avatar id say youre beyond old dude, youre ancient :p

Now there's some irony. :lol:

You are referring to the youngest man to ever serve as the President of the United States. I suppose from a modern perspective, his memory is somewhat faded but I have always considered him one of my personal heroes. And by comparison with today's breed of politicians (of all parties) they Definitely don't make 'em like they used to!

-Elgalad
 
Nah, that's Lt. Colonel Theodore Roosevelt.

This was Kaiser Wilhelm..

willie.jpg


I don't see the resemblance, but I guess the case could be made..?:confused:
In any case, there was no real comparison between these two men aside from the fact that they were contemporaries who lead their respective nations during the Age of Imperialism.


-Elgalad
 
Why are you people so hateful towards Michal Moore? I admit, maybe his way of getting people's attention is a bit....excessive, but his movie was very well made and thought out, and several points that many flatly refuse to acknowledge are exposed. If this movie doesn't turn a lot of people's heads in interest, our country's going to hell in a handbasket. Presidency is not a business, it's a job and a responsibilty. I wouldn't be surprised if Bush wins this election, if not just by buying his way in *again*. And if he does win again, I wouldn't be surprised if he made a constitutional amendment so he could get himself elected a third term. This, gentlemen, is not a presidency. It's the beginning of a dynasty.
 
im not hateful i like him

also, 1 thing to be said for him, he gets his facts right, i read trough many right wing web pages, complaining about bowling for columbine, and the stuff they were complaining about is like, well he said it took him 10 minutes to get a rifle at that bank, in reality it takes a full hour!


theyre completely missing the point, the point being: THEYRE GIVING AWAY FREE GUNS AT A BANK!!!!

+he never said it took 10 minutes, he just wisely cut away the 50 minutes of him waiting for the paperwork to be done!

no factual errors!

i cant say the same for rush limbaugh(who btw is a big fat idiot :))

and bill o reilly

until i read the al franken book, lies and lying liars, i didnt know oreilly claims to be independent!! :wow:

ps.iron cross is cool, once i had to explain to a friend that its not a nazi symbol!
 
Jawz II said:
theyre completely missing the point, the point being: THEYRE GIVING AWAY FREE GUNS AT A BANK!!!!
They didn't give free guns away at the bank. They gave vouchers for a gun at a local gun shop. And he had to go through a complete federal background check. He just came back to the bank and walked out of it with the gun.

Jawz II said:
+he never said it took 10 minutes, he just wisely cut away the 50 minutes of him waiting for the paperwork to be done!
In that case:

If I point a gun at you but fail to tell you it's a cap gun and you think it is real then it is your fault for not knowing it's a cap gun.
 
I dont hate Michael Moore either. To do so would be to grant him the sort of attention he craves most. Hating someone's message does not equate to hating them as an individual. I have said the same thing about Clinton. If I ever met Slick Willie in a bar or we went bowling together, or played a round of golf, I am sure it would be one of the finest experiences in my life. He Is a charming, intelligent person. That being said, the moment a discussion of politics came up and I was forced to slash his liberal arguments to ribbons by sheer logic, He might not find My company as enjoyable as I did his. ;)

Michael Moore on the other hand.. well, I can see the bar thing, and maybe bowling, but not if it included trying to score a strike by abusing the grief of family members of the Columbine tragedy.

-Elgalad
 
T-Money said:
And if he does win again, I wouldn't be surprised if he made a constitutional amendment so he could get himself elected a third term. This, gentlemen, is not a presidency. It's the beginning of a dynasty.

Presidents do not change the Constitution. Congress and the Constitutional Convention of the States do. Besides.. according to the left, Bush never won in 2000, so when he wins this November, why Shouldn't he run in 2008? It would only be for his second term. :lol:

-Elgalad
 
you dont like clintons policy?

he was very right wing for a democrat, pluse look at what he did for america while he was pres, america has never been riched than then!

any look at GWB, i dont think america has been poorer in the past 50 years than now, ok maybe the reagan years :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom