Mongolian UA

[Cryopyre]

Am I the only one who finds their UA to really break up their flavor? Do you think a UA related to establishing a puppet empire to fit them more historically?

 

[sufficiency]

The point of playing the Mongols is Keshiks. The rest are pretty meh.

 

[Darkeagle6]

Indeed. The most important part of their UA is the +1 move for mounted units. That, + Keshiks and Khans, is your ability to establish a puppet empire right there

 

[IkM]

I have 4 Keshiks and 2 Khans. almost destroyed Ottomans and Arabs with them. all of my Keshiks shooting twice in one turn this makes them 8 Keshiks Khans healing wounded soldiers every turn. so, Monguls are unstoppable

 

[Matthew.]

Isn't the point of their UA to help establish that large puppet empire? Who cares about diplo hits from sacking CS's, Keshiks can hold their own against anything industrial and below.

 

[compwiz1202]

Yea two adjacent Keshik with a Khan stacked with each are ridiculous, especially once you get March. Oh yea and Logistics takes it to ludicrous speed for sure

 

[Santa Maria]

Yes I agree that the mongolian UA is weird, it should primarily help against the major civs somehow imo.

Offtopic: I find it very strange that civilopedia states Keshik has 5 moves + the mongolian UA which is plus one movement, equals 6 movement total, but the Keshik still only has 5 movement