Who is looking at things through a Western lens?
We don't consider Confucianism to be a religion. It's simply a code of ethics to us.
Rites and rituals exist simply to keep society well-ordered.
The notion of what is "religion" is a Western concept.
Umm, isn't that what religion is? IMO I think they qualify as such, whether or not they had this notion. After all, all of these other "actual" religions have codes of ethics which if followed were supposed to create a well ordered society. A religion can be simply a system of beliefs that one is dedicated to, not necessarily a deity/ies, whether its a dedication to the belief that there is a hierarchy in which one has there place and must fulfill their obligations to whom ever in which one is led to personal salvation based on morality not piety. Or if its a dedication to the belief that one must worship a god and his little book.
And I'm all for all of the wonders, except the silk road, and I'm kind of iffy on Zheng He's voyage. I'm against hate Silk Road because thats exceptionally decentralized, it would be like building the Trans-Sahara route, or Mediterranean trade. If the Silk Road were just one road paved with gold, I might find such a wonder sound, but since it isn't, no. At least with the others like Hollywood or Graceland they're a place and they have/had significant impact with Western culture, namely the USA, but the Silk Road spans a continent. Even the ones like universal suffrage or theory of evolution, its kind of like a research project, but it's not actually research, once built, you establish that the concept was born there.
Too long, don't bother Although a good read on my idea for trade routes and a possible Silk Road
I think that there should be some sort of way to look at not just naval routes, but land routes and that it would be awesome if a road was so traveled that it became of a legendary status and thus a wonder for all who had a city on it, now how something might become heavily traded like that is, say you have a city which is say the focal point where from that city extends a road to a different civilization, this focal point is such because it has all the resources of your civilization and is the only way for the other one to access it, thus it becomes a major trade city supposing these resources are in demand. The roads with the shortest route between that city and the one with the actual resource are minor routes. Now say that you have another city on the other side of your civilization and you just established a route to a civilization near it. The shortest route between those two cities now becomes a major trading road and each civilization gains trade benefits from this major connection. Of course, it always pays to be the middle man and as one you receive full trade income from these routes and hell you may be getting a little more 'cause your taxing it. The two civilizations that are farther apart don't receive as much income from each other so they seek to cut out the middle man and make a road directly to each other.
Of course this would be all very messy, because you would have to have an entire system of consumers and producers and demand for foreign products say even if you had them already but who's to say that the dye in one part of the world is the same as the next, and if the civilization is completely without a resource then it will be high demand. So you could have things like the sugar and silver trade from the new world, where those weren't too common in other areas and as a result, were in demand. This would also lead to things building cities like Manila to govern the trade and be a hub for Spanish goods.
Either way, such a thing would result in a tangible trade line that one could take advantage of with even naval routes having a part
Well, that was completely unrelated and long... And now for something completely different