Moronic Anti-Videogame hit piece

AlpsStranger

Jump jump on the tiger!
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
5,820
Reuters said:
The man who shot dead 20 children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school wanted to kill more people than the 77 slain by a Norwegian man in a 2011 rampage, CBS News reported on Monday, citing unnamed law enforcement sources.

A Connecticut state police spokesman dismissed the report as inaccurate speculation.

Adam Lanza, 20, who killed himself as police closed in on him at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, saw himself in direct competition with Anders Behring Breivik, who killed 77 people in a bombing and shooting attack in Norway on July 22, 2011, CBS said. Breivik surrendered to police.

Citing two officials briefed on the Newtown investigation, CBS said Lanza targeted the elementary school because he saw it as the “easiest target” with the “largest cluster of people.”

The report did not say how the investigators learned of Lanza’s desire to compete with Breivik.

Lanza was also motivated by violent videogames and had spent numerous hours playing games and working on his computer shooting skills in a private gaming room in his basement with blacked out windows, CBS said. Investigators recovered a large number of games from the basement, the report said.

Evidence shows that in his mind, Lanza was likely acting out the fantasies of a videogame during his shooting spree with each death amounting to some kind of “score,” CBS said.

Lanza killed 20 schoolchildren aged 6 and 7 plus six adults who worked at the school, shocking the United States and leading President Barack Obama to propose new gun-control legislation.

Authorities have not publicly spoken of his motive.

“This is not official Connecticut State Police information and is someone’s speculation regarding the case,” Connecticut State Police Lieutenant Paul Vance told Reuters in an email statement.

When asked if the CBS report was in any way accurate, Vance responded, “No.”


Breivik, a self-styled warrior against Muslim immigration, killed eight people by bombing the Oslo government headquarters and then shot dead 69 people at the ruling party’s summer youth camp.

A Norwegian judge last year sentenced Breivik to the maximum 21 years in prison, though his release can be put off indefinitely should he be deemed a threat to society.

I don't even know what to say anymore. It's just relentless. They are absolutely determined to start some kind of mass moral panic. They are just fanning the flames on purpose at this point.

I know everyone thinks I'm nuts, but if gamers and game developers don't get ahead of this it's going to run over us. We absolutely cannot be politically passive in this environment.
 
I'm increasingly convinced that a video game ban might be good for you so you could find something else to obsess about.
 
I actually don't think it's that crazy to suggest playing a videogame could influence a killer like this. We never know what a deranged mind might take from any given piece of media. After all, Charles Manson cited the Beatles song Helter Skelter. John Hinckley was trying to impress Jodie Foster. I'm pretty sure people in the past thought The Catcher in the Rye might influence people. And so forth.
 
But that's not how the piece is written. What you are saying is sensible. You know that's not what they're driving at.

I'm increasingly convinced that a video game ban might be good for you so you could find something else to obsess about.

Funny, but is this not a completely unethical piece?
 
I laughed at "computer shooting skills." It sounds like he was literally shooting at computers.

I know one guy got into trouble for making a map for Counter-Strike based on his school, and just recently another one making a map based on a transit system. But it's kind of funny because if a movie studio wanted to film a violent movie there (the transit system, I mean, not the high school) there probably wouldn't be such an outrage.

Sometimes the double standards confuse me.
 
But that's not how the piece is written. What you are saying is sensible. You know that's not what they're driving at.

Well that depends. Are they arguing explicitly for bans? It doesn't appear that way.
 
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that there's probably something wrong with someone who spends that much time playing COD. It might not be an indication of psychopathy, but it's certainly something to look at.
 
We'll see Naziesque video-game burnings before long eh?

Its too bad you can't toss Steam into a big pile and burn it eh?
 
Are they arguing explicitly for bans?

They are arguing implicitly for bans, yes. I think that's a reasonable statement.

We'll see Naziesque video-game burnings before long eh?

Look, I'm worked up but I'm not an idiot. I know you like to belittle me over this, but I'm being serious. What I'm afraid of is something like the ridiculous labyrinth of laws they have in Germany cropping up in the US.
 
Why? Pointing out a thing is bad does not mean you want legislative action on a thing.
 
We'll see Naziesque video-game burnings before long eh?

Its too bad you can't toss Steam into a big pile and burn it eh?

Well Steam is water and you cant exactly burn water
 
Man, that has to be the funniest thing I've heard in years :lol:

Um, what? It's a pretty uncontroversial statement.

Are Reuters pushing for a ban on videogames?
 
All videogames? No. Just the "bad" ones.

When did Reuters say this?

I don't think wire services are in the business of advocating legislative action.
 
I am very confused by this reaction. I see nothing in the OP about banning videogames, I don't even see how the claim made about influence is that any more unreasonable than typical journalistic sloppiness.
 
Two sentences about videogames in that article about Lanza being a copycat of Breivik. Relentless indeed...

I do hate anti-videogame hysteria, but I think you are overreacting here.
 
Back
Top Bottom