i got to say, the game has a new fill to it, and it fills good.
my first game as india went well, it was dule size map, pangia, warlord dif to give my self time to graspe the new game..
i went well and i love the indan fw, and i whold sugest every one try him out..
i allso had the aswoka *sp* or what ever his name is as my leader, and those traits are not bad * the spiritual, and theone trat that gives u 50% of ur civic upkeep*
i got to say, the no anarcy is acaly realy nice. even the 1 turn of anarcy can be bother some some times. but with spiritual it changes right then.
the 50% civic thing i dont think made Too much of a difrents. but after playing as one with out that trait i realised how important it can be in the early game. it saves u a lil money that can be critical.
by 1916, i had defeted my enamy and won the game
my 2nd game i qout about 1700
i fell to far behind in tech, was about 500 points below the top score, and i had the largest empire. but allso the most denslypacked citys. so i had to many citys and was haveing a hard time keeping my econamy up. my milliry was the smallist, with just over 250,000 troops. i was being atacked from the sea, and was racked with huge stacks of chines units seemingly roaming freely throw my lands, due to the lack of any millitary force to atack them... ther was just no way i chold have won due to the lack of a sizable military, lack of any navy, and so on.. so i gave up
i did realy good tho early game, i conqerd the inca *who just befor thay got conqered had 1 city, and thay had in that 1 city 200,000 troops. so that tells u something about the size of my millitary.... it was alot of units for 1 city tho too*
allso i played as the greeces
the greece hoplite *im not gonna stop calling it that* was not bad, it had a long life span, and an extra strenght macking it even deadly aginst mounted units. i usly upgraded it with a archer and melie strenght bounus to make it more usefull..
i whold still go with the inda fw tho..
my first game as india went well, it was dule size map, pangia, warlord dif to give my self time to graspe the new game..
i went well and i love the indan fw, and i whold sugest every one try him out..
i allso had the aswoka *sp* or what ever his name is as my leader, and those traits are not bad * the spiritual, and theone trat that gives u 50% of ur civic upkeep*
i got to say, the no anarcy is acaly realy nice. even the 1 turn of anarcy can be bother some some times. but with spiritual it changes right then.
the 50% civic thing i dont think made Too much of a difrents. but after playing as one with out that trait i realised how important it can be in the early game. it saves u a lil money that can be critical.
by 1916, i had defeted my enamy and won the game
my 2nd game i qout about 1700
i fell to far behind in tech, was about 500 points below the top score, and i had the largest empire. but allso the most denslypacked citys. so i had to many citys and was haveing a hard time keeping my econamy up. my milliry was the smallist, with just over 250,000 troops. i was being atacked from the sea, and was racked with huge stacks of chines units seemingly roaming freely throw my lands, due to the lack of any millitary force to atack them... ther was just no way i chold have won due to the lack of a sizable military, lack of any navy, and so on.. so i gave up
i did realy good tho early game, i conqerd the inca *who just befor thay got conqered had 1 city, and thay had in that 1 city 200,000 troops. so that tells u something about the size of my millitary.... it was alot of units for 1 city tho too*
allso i played as the greeces
the greece hoplite *im not gonna stop calling it that* was not bad, it had a long life span, and an extra strenght macking it even deadly aginst mounted units. i usly upgraded it with a archer and melie strenght bounus to make it more usefull..
i whold still go with the inda fw tho..
