NBA 2007 Finals..

[weedend]

which team are you in?
Cleveland Cavaliers or the San Antonio Spurs?
im for the SA Spurs..

 

[jubnub]

well i'm with the Spurs. Go Spurs Go!

 

[Red Door]

Gotta go for the team that doesn't have Bron-Bron on it.

 

[civverguy]

I'm on neutral ground.

 

[downtown]

I Am A Witness!!!

Rise Up!!!

Go Cavs

 

[Red Door]

I Am A Witness!!!

Rise Up!!!

Go Cavs

I am a witness to a 14 point performance, including 6 on two last-minute 3's. Yes, I am a witness.

 

[downtown]

I am a witness to a 14 point performance, including 6 on two last-minute 3's. Yes, I am a witness.

Look. I wouldn't be talking mr. my team got bounced by the cavs in the playoffs for two years in a row, and we were barely .500 this season. Go witness that.

 

[Azale]

Now gentlemen, I am sure we can all agree that the Spurs are far superior to both team's combined in every way.

My team of preference? The Spurs, duh.

 

[Red Door]

Look. I wouldn't be talking mr. my team got bounced by the cavs in the playoffs for two years in a row, and we were barely .500 this season. Go witness that.

At least we play offense.

 

[A Revolutionary]

I'll have to take the uhm... SPURS, SPURS, oh yeah, and the SPURS again.

 

[RedFusion]

At least we play offense.

At least we're still playing

 

[jubnub]

Spurs are the NBA Champions!!!! 83-82.

 

[civverguy]

Its a dynasty for the Spurs!

 

[A Revolutionary]

Its a dynasty for the Spurs!

Yes! Only three other NBA franchises have won 4 or more titles. Spurs are the fourth ones.

 

[pacesplace]

There is one thing the Spurs haven't done over the past nine years, though, that other "dynasties" all have done: win back-to-back titles.

 

[Azale]

And your point?

 

[A Revolutionary]

There is one thing the Spurs haven't done over the past nine years, though, that other "dynasties" all have done: win back-to-back titles.

Are you suggesting that the Spurs wouldn't be a "true" dynasty even if they were to win every other title for the next 10 years? The repeat isn't as important as always being a title contender. (something the Spurs have done for the last nine years)

 

[classical_hero]

Once they have repeated, then they can be considered a dynasty.

 

[Darkness]

Once they have repeated, then they can be considered a dynasty.

3 championships in 5 years is not enough for a dynasty? The Spurs have consistently excelled and have been among the contenders for the title for 9 years and they've won the title 4 times. Seems like a pretty strong argument for a dynasty to me.

But hey, maybe they'll repeat next year...

 

[A Revolutionary]

3 championships in 5 years is not enough for a dynasty? The Spurs have consistently excelled and have been among the contenders for the title for 9 years and they've won the title 4 times. Seems like a pretty strong argument for a dynasty to me.

But hey, maybe they'll repeat next year...

Pretty much what I just said. I'm glad someone agrees with me.