I find it curious that they chose to call it "French Empire" instead of simply "France." Their Spanish civ also focuses on a particular period of colonization and empire building, yet they call it "Spain" and not "Spanish Empire."
Not entirely. American Land Hunger was present from before the revolution. The Pennsylvania county I grew up in, in the middle of the state and middle of the Appalachian Mountains, was settled starting in the 1750s by people who already thought the area west of Philadelphia was getting 'too crowded' and despite the fact that the land was claimed by the Haudenosenee and was therefore not really safe for anybody else. And the settlement of the 'Old Northwest' - Ohio, Indiana country in the 1790s was every bit as aggressive and genocidal as anything that happened further west in the last half of the 19th century.Can't say I agree at all. The Western expansion and industrial boom were both 100 years after the colonial period.
While I agree, America's design screams "late 19th century and Charles Dickens hates you" to me.Not entirely. American Land Hunger was present from before the revolution. The Pennsylvania county I grew up in, in the middle of the state and middle of the Appalachian Mountains, was settled starting in the 1750s by people who already thought the area west of Philadelphia was getting 'too crowded' and despite the fact that the land was claimed by the Haudenosenee and was therefore not really safe for anybody else. And the settlement of the 'Old Northwest' - Ohio, Indiana country in the 1790s was every bit as aggressive and genocidal as anything that happened further west in the last half of the 19th century.
And if you stretch the definition a bit, 'Industrialization' was already starting with iron furnaces going up in eastern and central Pennsylvania right after the revolution, the start of major iron and steel manufacture that culminated in Pittsburgh later in the century. Not on the same scale, by any means, but significant in the earlier period.
This design of France does not strike me as very philosophical...On the other hand, they could have used Philosophe for their Special Characters for France, a group that could have included:
yea the ~1730-1950s modern age really puts America in a weird spot of having to combine all the elements kinda like how france's civ is compiling the republics and empire (all before the 4th republic anyways) into one thing.Can't say I agree at all. The Western expansion and industrial boom were both 100 years after the colonial period.
That is weird, I know you can't call Modern Age America "Imperial America", cause even during the height of the territorial gain in the 1890s that was not what people wanted America to be known as, and I know today its not how we want to view or call America either.I find it curious that they chose to call it "French Empire" instead of simply "France." Their Spanish civ also focuses on a particular period of colonization and empire building, yet they call it "Spain" and not "Spanish Empire."
It may have been a simple mistake, musically the two songs referenced by the composer are two colonial pieces, or maybe this is evidence of Firaxis changing their mind and maybe reverting in the design state to a one era America.On the other hand, this is not a Colonial America design. If they decided to call it that, it wouldn’t be appropriate. They should name it Industrial America or something similar if they wanted to split America into two, with Contemporary America reserved for Age 4. However, I hope this was just a mistake.
I dont actually agree with calling it Colonial America, however if it is a mistake they have not attempted to rectify it (the description of that music video also calls it colonial america). I was just trying to rationalise the thought process in the situation that it is not a mistake.Yeah. I utterly fail to see how anyone can look at an America that's all about the Frontier (Wild West) expansion and mistake that for a Colonial (pre-Revolution) America design. It's very much an Industrial-Far West (ie, late 1800s, around and after the Civil War) America.
The Civ Guide, on the other hand, just calls it America.I dont actually agree with calling it Colonial America, however if it is a mistake they have not attempted to rectify it (the description of that music video also calls it colonial america). I was just trying to rationalise the thought process in the situation that it is not a mistake.
Despite the title, neither were the Philosophes. As much as anything, the title stuck because it covers such a wide range, as they did (kind of like the classical Greek 'natural philosophers', which meant pretty much any topic they wanted to write about)This design of France does not strike me as very philosophical...
lol sorry, at this point with Layfette, they are pretty comingled in the mind.Look, we’re discussing America in a thread about France.![]()
It seems apparent from the graphical design that it's intended to be a Conservatory. I don't know why they didn't go with that.Similarly, "Jardin à la Française" simply means "French Garden." They could have simply called it "Jardin," as the French part is sort of self-evident.
When you're in Philadelphia, don't ask for a Philly Cheesesteak.Similarly, "Jardin à la Française" simply means "French Garden." They could have simply called it "Jardin," as the French part is sort of self-evident.
"French" representation in the Exploration Era could also come in the form of the Franks. Though they idea of them being represented by Burgundy, Aquitaine or Brittany is interesting as well.Honestly I think there's far more ground to include the French as an Exploration civ than the English (the Normans are basically English with a handful of extra cities in Normandy).
But my preference for an Exploration "france" has always leaned toward other great duchies of France, rather than France itself - Burgundy, Brittany, etc.
I find the French design in Civ7 distinct enough from Civ6, which revolved around building world wonders and generating tourism. Of course, there are some points of intersection here, but the Civ7 design feels a bit more militaristic and not as focused on wonders.I have mixed feelings - on one hand the mechanics look fun, on another we have yet again France in civ with somehow zero scientific, industrial, economic or expansionist bonuses, once again having a mishmash of military and cultural stuff like in every civ game ever. It's really jarring for me how this heavyweight hegemonic superpower of the entire past millenium always focuses on the tall cultural play you could just as well slap on Siam or any random small "culturally rich" country.
Technically, it's "Garden in the French way." The French formal garden is a specific type of garden: very manicured, orderly, and geometric, as compared to the English garden, which is more rustic, "natural," and organic. It looks like jardin régulier "regular [as in orderly] garden" and jardin classique "classical garden" are also used though.Similarly, "Jardin à la Française" simply means "French Garden." They could have simply called it "Jardin," as the French part is sort of self-evident.
I love this! Finally they’ve designed a France that balances militarism, politics, and culture instead of just “build wonders get culture.”