Nice to see that this "argumentation" of the few people who still defend Civ V is now as alive as it was at the start of the game...
Anyways... tried to play it again.. had a look at the kiddie graphics and the dumb casualisations and quit again. After you´ve finished this game once it´s so unbelievable boring.... another reason it´s no true Civ
Dear Nekator,
I did reread my post again and again to catch where I "argued" to defend the game.
I have to admit that I'm one of the *not so few* people who actually like the game. Nevertheless I see it's flaws, too.
But in contrast to you, I see good progress in fixing this flaws and I am willing to trust the devs in continuing their promising work. THIS is, what I was defending in my post!
I strongly believe, that people's perspectives are different and it is impossible to fulfill everybodies taste. There is no absolute in life. And, dear Nekator, IF there is anything childish around here, it is not CiV's graphic (by the way: Civ4 was much "worse" in this respect!) but a statement like the absolute "... it´s so unbelievable boring" and "... it´s no true Civ".
While I accept that you do not like the game (which is a regrettable but perfectly valid opinion), I would love to see some relativeness in such a sentence, such as an added "... for me."
As for many people (with likewise perfectly valid opinions) it *is* a true Civ!