Albertan Civfanatic
Albertan Nationalist
Will 2026 see massive new updates? Will there be a huge DLC, similar to Gods and Kings?
Yes, we could totally expect first expansion this year. But on top of that we could expect large updates from patches as Firaxis currently tests big improvements to some core mechanics.
I don't think it's relevant. Even though some part of the community is negative toward the game, Firaxis has to sell expansions for business model to work. With the amount of staff they have, they don't all work on patches, especially considering that a lot of those people (graphical designers, sound artists, etc.) don't have anything to do with patches.I would not be so sure there will be an expansion this year. If this playing-as-one-civ feature they say they are testing ends up as an expansion, then sure. But as the goal of it would be to win people back who don't like Civ VII in its current state, an expansion those people would have to pay extra for might be a hard sell.
If that feature ends up as a free update, it would probably bind resources that would usually be used for an expansion, so there might only sell leaders and civs along free updates to the core this year.
paying for stuff that should have been in the base game ? yep I would be angry (if I had paid)
I do hope that if we get the current age it will be in a large free update, alongside a paid expansion.
Everything that could ever be possibly be released should be in the base game? I feel like "should be in the base game" is a vastly overused claim. A cliche at this point.paying for stuff that should have been in the base game ? yep I would be angry (if I had paid)
I do hope that if we get the current age it will be in a large free update, alongside a paid expansion.
If the Workshop was advertised for the new year (e.g. from now onwards), there's no way the feature they want community feedback is going to be ready for February, unless the community feedback isn't considered.I hope that we‘ll see a larger patch in February that includes playing any civ in any age. This needs to be introduced properly as a kind of 2.0 release and I expect news about it to come earlier than just a week ahead to build some steam.
As for a larger expansion, it seems reasonable to expect one for the second half of the year. But maybe this got postponed because there is more work going into the base game as originally planned.
I don't think it's relevant. Even though some part of the community is negative toward the game, Firaxis has to sell expansions for business model to work. With the amount of staff they have, they don't all work on patches, especially considering that a lot of those people (graphical designers, sound artists, etc.) don't have anything to do with patches.
I, honestly, expect 4th age expansion close to the end of the year. I expect some part of the community to be really angry with this, but it will still sell.
Well if they have the "play as a civ for multiple ages" implemented... then they could release a free modern age update... along with a paid Expansion Pack of 10 Atomic Age civs and 4-5 Leaders.Nah, there's no way any extra age (be it medieval or modern) comes for free. If it's an actual new age with a transition and all, it will need 10+ new civs, or if it's some sort of fake transition, heavy rework on the current civs.
It already started yesterday.I think they will be starting the feature workshop soon-ish, it will be curious if that ends up as like a semi-private beta for an expansion, or just for patches, or what.
Given the effort the devs are putting into that Workshop (its organization, moderation, etc), they're definitely planning push some big updates in the future. They're just not leaving anything to chance, that's all.Indeed. I wouldn't expect a significant update for several months, simply because Firaxis is apparently running/going to run some stuff through playtesters in the Feature Workshop.
If I remember correctly, they only planned to have a week or two of player testing for each feature. Which means at the beginning of February they'll have feedback on which of their partially implemented features works best. I'd say it's possible to finish this feature for release by the end of February if user feedback won't change anything.If the Workshop was advertised for the new year (e.g. from now onwards), there's no way the feature they want community feedback is going to be ready for February, unless the community feedback isn't considered.
Which wouldn't exactly be ideal.
The have to sell both small DLC and expansions. The have different selling patterns and marketing.They have to sell something, but this does not necessarily have to be expansions. More leaders and civs might just sell well enough. Of course I don't have the data how much a DLC earns compared to a full expansion, but funding patches just by selling civs might be a viable business model for some time.
"No one" is a bit too strong. Many current Civ7 owners would buy 4th age expansion even now and if legacy paths / victories will be improved, the number of potential buyers will grow.A 4th age would make a good expansion, because it would be quite self-contained. But to sell it, they would first need to convince people that a 4th age would be fun by making Modern fun. Otherwise, no one might buy it.
Theoretically, sure. I think that's a big if. If there is potential for change, the window for this round of testing would've been locked in advance. And to do so it would've need to have been positioned well in advance of any release.Which means at the beginning of February they'll have feedback on which of their partially implemented features works best. I'd say it's possible to finish this feature for release by the end of February if user feedback won't change anything.