Larwin
Prince
Spoiler :
I think my opening is ok just need a few minor improvements. Partly because I wasn't sure where I was going to send my settler. Horses or gold or somewhere between.
I'm playing on noble at normal speed.
@Larwin:
<cut to point in spoiler>
Spoiler :It's kind of too bad that you ended up instantly hooked up to the copper, because that means that you can't build warriors to help you explore, and it's not worth researching hunting this early just for one scout.
Given what you know of the map, I would go for the gold. I almost never want to build a city without a food resource, even if it means borrowing from another city. After all, surplus food becomes less desirable the more you grow.
@Larwin:
Spoiler :Spoiler :I'm thinking that using the whip so early is a bit of a mistake: you still have that marble, and plenty of hills. IMO, whipping is only better if you either can't get hammers for that city, or you absolutely need the unit NOW. This is especially true when you don't have a hammer multiplier. I think you should've gotten masonry before AH in this case.
As for where to found your second city, that's a toughie. One issue that I noticed is that you explored the peninsula, then fortified in place, right? Well, that left a lot of land near your capital that you haven't explored yet. In general, if you start out near a chokepoint or in the middle of the map, you should consider building a second unit to help you explore. It's kind of too bad that you ended up instantly hooked up to the copper, because that means that you can't build warriors to help you explore, and it's not worth researching hunting this early just for one scout.
Given what you know of the map, I would go for the gold. I almost never want to build a city without a food resource, even if it means borrowing from another city. After all, surplus food becomes less desirable the more you grow.
I think that you should see if you can get there by foot first. If not (and I'm not telling if you can or not), then you could look at the horse alternative. If it comes to that, I'd settle where I can grab the cows, too.
It's a little random, I admit, but in time for pyramids at some difficulty levels. I did it in one variant, but (a) I play at Prince and (b) I know the map in advance and (c) I use huts and managed to get Masonry through them and (d) I went for stone for my 3rd city ahead of some potentially better places, like SE near the horses.The addition of stone seems a little random, though. I'm guessing it's because we're protective? It's way out there, so I assume you meant for us to have it for 1/4 priced castles? Or do you consider it early enough for pyramids?
I had no idea the AIs avoided the oracle if I put a few hammers into it! Is that just for non-IND, non-marble leaders or do they all do it?I built 'henge for the CHA bonus after putting a turn of into the oracle so the AIs would stay away from it.
Thanks Larwin@Larwin
You can post as often as you like - the point of the game is to learn, after all. Sticking to just the 'checkpoints' is not required.
Spoiler :
What's the logic of the placement of York?I wanted to get the gold resource and wanted a food source in my first square. and I didnt want the first city to grow unhappy. I see now that the flood plains may have been adequate. I'm still getting used to stategies on playing this game. My first decision may not always be the one someone else would make.
You've got a grassland and floodplains river to your immediate east, and no plans to settle there?I might try that I do not always see the big picture like a more experienced player would. I might put my next city there. I tend to look at resource maps more and get strategic resources hooked up asap. I can see now that the floodplains could be used more effeciently.
You have no AIs to your west - focus your attention east for now. You also have no border contact with any AI - that almost always means you should focus on expansion as long as you can afford it.Ok thats what I was thinking too. on one my pics I put the questions on I might consider the horses outside where theres more places to explore as another city spot. And wait on back cities til I have no more places to expand east ward. Theres at least one or two strong cities in the peninsula.
You need more workers.I know. I try to get 3 or 4 more workers before I build another settler. I think I need at least one more axe to attack if something invades my citys. I guess major defences can come later but I hate when the AI catches me unprepared lol.
It would help if you put more context around your pictures - why did you research what you researched, what are your intentions, etc.I get a different idea from every game I guess. I figure I will need all the techs eventually no matter which ones i do first. seems every game has a different list of tech priorities. I research what I know future techs I plan will need and also I research techs that allow workers tasks. I don't always make the same decision every game unless I know what I will need to do first. People been telling me food first and I always try to do that. and Bronze working as early as possible once food is available. slavery civic I have a little trouble with because one person tells me I should whip and another person tells me I should chop. my timing may be different than some players. I know I may not be a monarch player but I try to get help so I can get to that phase. I think I may have offended some people with earlier discussions. Problem is I feel I'm in a lower experience bracket than everyone else. I would like to shadow a few games to learn but at Noble fill I can manage a couple wins if I just do a few games.
I wanted to get the gold resource and wanted a food source in my first square. and I didnt want the first city to grow unhappy. I see now that the flood plains may have been adequate.
I tend to look at resource maps more and get strategic resources hooked up asap. I can see now that the floodplains could be used more effeciently
@huerfanista:I had no idea the AIs avoided the oracle if I put a few hammers into it! Is that just for non-IND, non-marble leaders or do they all do it?
Hmm. I still haven't got any comments on my situation (post 50). I figured it just got buried, so I hope nobody will mind the bump.
@ Larwin: I hope you don't feel that I or anybody else was putting you down. You're right--this is a learning experience, for all of us. In fact, looking at your situation helped me understand a few things, too. My comments about exploration put my gut feelings into perspective clearly enough that I could express myself. Thanks, buddy!