I have read these forums as a guest for...sheesh, a year now? I have picked up some excellent advice and such but I just cant seem to execute. I dont play MP which makes this post even more embarassing, so all my trouble is from the AI.
What I mean, take Sulla's walkthru....excellent stuff in there right? Hes playing on what you guys probably consider a noob level of Noble(as he does, but it was for purposes of his walkthru) and he easily, without thinking, dominated the entire thing.
I play flargin' Warlord and have yet to win a game in over 2 years of playing. I think I did once, but I have a new PC now, so whatever. I stopped playing this game for that reason. I just dont seem to "get it", so to speak.
For example, I have read the Beginners Tips sticky on top, wonderful stuff (with good arguments too). I have tried following them to a tee and have a lot of early success in my game. But then it all goes to hell...let me give you a synopsis of EVERY SINGLE game I play.
Since rapid expansion isnt really an option, I wait until my first city is at 3 before I start to train a settler. Im pretty finicky about escorts so either thru setllement discovery or training a warrior, both starting cities are defended.
Worker time. Connect, grab available resource, then cultivate the surrounding area. I usually have both Hinduism and Judaism and are well into Ironworking before I consider expanding again.
Mind you, I always have all the early wonders (maybe, rarely I miss one) as well. Especially Pyramids.
Bla bla bla, build warriors/archers to defend my ever increasing feeble empire. Tops in every score, especially money and culture (not very hard to do on Warlord, I know). Have 5-6 cities that are all well defended and have workers a-plenty working their fields and networking.
This seems to be when I stumble. Either I am not trading enough (really only resource, some tech but its all stuff I pass on my way to civil service, so meh) or I am not expanding enough (via war), but either way I stall.
I am still way ahead in tech and $$, but the AI focused more on tech for war. I havent and usually do not until well after drama/music/education/etc. All my cities and bordering AI civs that I have open borders all have both my religions in every city, already have both religious buildings for the $$ (which is why I am usually so far ahead).
When I do decide my corner of the world isnt enough, the sheer TIME it takes to expand is god awful. Ill have 3 stacks before I enter a conflict of my choosing. 4 muskettmen, 4 macemen and 4 cats a piece. All well and good to take 3 cities, but that isnt enough. Also, the AI is throwing Grenadiers at me, which means I waited too long or researched all the wrong techs for too long. So after I take 3 cities automatically, Im dead in the water getting chewed up by the advanced army.
Obviously, I wait for the cities I did take to stop revolt (if I dont have some artists) and call for peace (which is always accepted). Now I have 3-5 new cities that are WAAAAAAY behind in buildings.
Is this where I make one my mistakes?
I build them up to the level they should be, cranking out workers to cultivate and connect the corresponding outliers. By this time, its almost 1800 AD....as you can see I am going to lose. I dont even have the world map yet outside of my continent and yet the AI from the other side of the world is declaring war on me. I couldnt get an army there if I even knew where "there" was.
Most of the time I find a way to bring balance back and all is well, but with time being as late as it is, I run right out of it and some AI wins a timed victory or the space race (which is puzzling).
I quit playing this game because I sit here and read the CivFans playing warmup games on Noble just trying out new strats and I cant even smell victory on Warlord for Christs sake.
I build every building in every city, which during my time writing this is probably my problem. Instead of building everything, should I be cranking out units? How do I show you folks a typical AI beatdown of DarkReign (on frickin' Warlord! GaaaAAaaAAGH!).
I dont even care about the abuse I am going to get from this post/thread anymore. I havent posted before because I knew I was fundamentally flawed in my approach, but I dont get where and how. I have played every Civ game and was quite good at CtP. But Civ4 was a departure from the previous games (in a better way) and I have yet to grasp, after 2 years, how to win at this game. Please. Help. Me.
What I mean, take Sulla's walkthru....excellent stuff in there right? Hes playing on what you guys probably consider a noob level of Noble(as he does, but it was for purposes of his walkthru) and he easily, without thinking, dominated the entire thing.
I play flargin' Warlord and have yet to win a game in over 2 years of playing. I think I did once, but I have a new PC now, so whatever. I stopped playing this game for that reason. I just dont seem to "get it", so to speak.
For example, I have read the Beginners Tips sticky on top, wonderful stuff (with good arguments too). I have tried following them to a tee and have a lot of early success in my game. But then it all goes to hell...let me give you a synopsis of EVERY SINGLE game I play.
Since rapid expansion isnt really an option, I wait until my first city is at 3 before I start to train a settler. Im pretty finicky about escorts so either thru setllement discovery or training a warrior, both starting cities are defended.
Worker time. Connect, grab available resource, then cultivate the surrounding area. I usually have both Hinduism and Judaism and are well into Ironworking before I consider expanding again.
Mind you, I always have all the early wonders (maybe, rarely I miss one) as well. Especially Pyramids.
Bla bla bla, build warriors/archers to defend my ever increasing feeble empire. Tops in every score, especially money and culture (not very hard to do on Warlord, I know). Have 5-6 cities that are all well defended and have workers a-plenty working their fields and networking.
This seems to be when I stumble. Either I am not trading enough (really only resource, some tech but its all stuff I pass on my way to civil service, so meh) or I am not expanding enough (via war), but either way I stall.
I am still way ahead in tech and $$, but the AI focused more on tech for war. I havent and usually do not until well after drama/music/education/etc. All my cities and bordering AI civs that I have open borders all have both my religions in every city, already have both religious buildings for the $$ (which is why I am usually so far ahead).
When I do decide my corner of the world isnt enough, the sheer TIME it takes to expand is god awful. Ill have 3 stacks before I enter a conflict of my choosing. 4 muskettmen, 4 macemen and 4 cats a piece. All well and good to take 3 cities, but that isnt enough. Also, the AI is throwing Grenadiers at me, which means I waited too long or researched all the wrong techs for too long. So after I take 3 cities automatically, Im dead in the water getting chewed up by the advanced army.
Obviously, I wait for the cities I did take to stop revolt (if I dont have some artists) and call for peace (which is always accepted). Now I have 3-5 new cities that are WAAAAAAY behind in buildings.
Is this where I make one my mistakes?
I build them up to the level they should be, cranking out workers to cultivate and connect the corresponding outliers. By this time, its almost 1800 AD....as you can see I am going to lose. I dont even have the world map yet outside of my continent and yet the AI from the other side of the world is declaring war on me. I couldnt get an army there if I even knew where "there" was.
Most of the time I find a way to bring balance back and all is well, but with time being as late as it is, I run right out of it and some AI wins a timed victory or the space race (which is puzzling).
I quit playing this game because I sit here and read the CivFans playing warmup games on Noble just trying out new strats and I cant even smell victory on Warlord for Christs sake.
I build every building in every city, which during my time writing this is probably my problem. Instead of building everything, should I be cranking out units? How do I show you folks a typical AI beatdown of DarkReign (on frickin' Warlord! GaaaAAaaAAGH!).
I dont even care about the abuse I am going to get from this post/thread anymore. I havent posted before because I knew I was fundamentally flawed in my approach, but I dont get where and how. I have played every Civ game and was quite good at CtP. But Civ4 was a departure from the previous games (in a better way) and I have yet to grasp, after 2 years, how to win at this game. Please. Help. Me.