Fair enough.NTFS is a good file system,
It was actually the work of IBM (it was then known as HPFS). IBM were in a partnership with MS at the time. MS decided to do a runner with what they knew and release NT, leaving IBM with OS/2. MS did change the file system slightly, as they do (can't remember how though). HPFS and NTFS actually have the same partition identifiers which I think seems unusual.even if it is MS
Linux and Mac OS/X can handle NTFS.and not compatible with others.
A lot of people. Just because they don't share your hobby's doesn't mean you need to be stuck up.I think so. I never understood non-geeks.
Seriously, who would think shopping for clothes was more interesting than checking out the latest GPUs?
A lot of people. Just because they don't share your hobby's doesn't mean you need to be stuck up.
New Technology File System. HPFS was High Performance.
...And apparently "New Technology" was originally derived from "Norther Telecom", a company that started development of Windows NT, that was taken-over by Microsoft. The "NT" label was kept, but the meaning was changed to be "New Technology".
An explanation of why there appears to be redundancy in the statement: "Built on Windows NT technology", which could be interpreted as "Built on WIndows New Technology technology".
Edit: JUst did some reaseach, and that might be rubbish. However Microsoft did have to negotiate with Nortel to use "NT" in the name.![]()