1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Nucleur War?

Discussion in 'Civ3 - General Discussions' started by Baleog, Oct 30, 2002.

?

Ever had a nucleur war? Strange question, but there you go.

  1. yep

    6 vote(s)
    40.0%
  2. nope

    9 vote(s)
    60.0%
  1. Baleog

    Baleog THE FIERCE

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2001
    Messages:
    1,217
    Location:
    Dublin
    Put quite simply have you, like me, never had a nucleur war (let alone never built a nuke, also like me :p).
    Just posting because it's kind of strange that after a year of playing civ3 I've never had one. I've never even seen a nuke used by the AI on the AI. This is normally because I tend to have the game finished up by the late modern stage. Either I've already won, am on the verge of achieving conquest/domination or am just so far aheadin techs that I go for diplomatic/spaceship victory.

    I don't reallt mean this as a thread on the civ related merits of nucleur warfare, but if that's what you feel the issue is talk away.

    (Now that I think of it I've never played a game as far as the year 2050! :crazyeyes:, though I have played many to the yea2049/48/47 etc. .... ... off topic ramble ... ...)
     
  2. JMac

    JMac Ruler of Smileys

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2001
    Messages:
    48
    Location:
    Vancouver Canada
    oh yah ive had quite a few wars with nukes. It happens so often that i always spread my army around so that the ai doesn't nuke it in my cities. :cool: :crazyeye:

    i guess im a warmonger :D :D
     
  3. RobOz

    RobOz Whatchoo lookin at?

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    194
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    I answered the poll to soon. I thought it was an opinion poll on whether or not you like to have nuclear war. So, one nope is a yes! I have had nuclear war and it sucks on many levels...
     
  4. werdhertz

    werdhertz I speak Canadianese

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    250
    Had the game for a year, but have never had a nuclear war. Ive built them only in one game, and i had about 20 ICBMs. Never used em though... I cant wait for PtW when a human player meets the wraith of my nukes!
     
  5. RobOz

    RobOz Whatchoo lookin at?

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    194
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Hey! Don't nuke me!

    Holy crap I hate nukes.
     
  6. Hellfire

    Hellfire Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2002
    Messages:
    349
    Location:
    Near Philly, PA
    I've had a few. By the time I get into the whole Nuclear era of combat, I'm well ahead of the competition and turning out a lot of units.

    When I get to this point, the only time war becomes nuclear is when the AI gets desperate.

    Let me summarize a recent game I played after winning the space race. I decided to move on and conquer the world for giggles.

    It was down to France and myself. France had about 20 nukes by the time I attacked. I stopped at 30 because it was a small map. That little french tart also had about 200 MIs and a few minimally effective but annoying stealth bombers, but no MAs and nothing else of major consequence. I decided to be cruel, get a ROP agreement and then put a lot of guys on her continent and attack.

    I should have extended the agreement and put up more units. I took half the continent as planned in one turn. I was worried about the ability for france to simply run me over with the sheer numbers of MIs as holding about 10 cities would divide my forces, so I bombed the roads/RRs halfway between the continents. This created a "firebreak" which the MI's had to cross. About 150 of them crossed, and I let lose with radar artillery and MA and decimated them on the next turn.

    What does this have to do with nukes? Well, in my conquest, I only got half the continent, and about half the nukes. After I decimated his MI stack, the AI got desperate and shot off 10 ICBMs and 1 tac nuke. I got 7 ICBMs with my SDI.

    I didn't fire nukes back until the end of the game when I simply nuked a couple of cities on islands (minimal pollution) and ended my conquest. Most often nuclear war is something I avoid because the polution can damage your productivity in the long run and in reality can slow your advance as it destroys the roads around a city.

    As an experiment I also nuked France at one point and found I could not destroy their nukes with my nukes. My philosophy was "Either I nuke them and get pollution or they nuke me and I get pollution." However, since no ICBMs were destroyed, it was overall a waste to nuke them for any reason. If anyone has input on nuclear wars in order to minimize damage to yourself by taking out your enemies nukes I'd like to hear it myself.
     
  7. Hellfire

    Hellfire Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2002
    Messages:
    349
    Location:
    Near Philly, PA
    I've had a few. By the time I get into the whole Nuclear era of combat, I'm well ahead of the competition and turning out a lot of units.

    When I get to this point, the only time war becomes nuclear is when the AI gets desperate.

    Let me summarize a recent game I played after winning the space race. I decided to move on and conquer the world for giggles.

    It was down to France and myself. France had about 20 nukes by the time I attacked. I stopped at 30 because it was a small map. That little french tart also had about 200 MIs and a few minimally effective but annoying stealth bombers, but no MAs and nothing else of major consequence. I decided to be cruel, get a ROP agreement and then put a lot of guys on her continent and attack.

    I should have extended the agreement and put up more units. I took half the continent as planned in one turn. I was worried about the ability for france to simply run me over with the sheer numbers of MIs as holding about 10 cities would divide my forces, so I bombed the roads/RRs halfway between the continents. This created a "firebreak" which the MI's had to cross. About 150 of them crossed, and I let lose with radar artillery and MA and decimated them on the next turn.

    What does this have to do with nukes? Well, in my conquest, I only got half the continent, and about half the nukes. After I decimated his MI stack, the AI got desperate and shot off 10 ICBMs and 1 tac nuke. I got 7 ICBMs with my SDI.

    I didn't fire nukes back until the end of the game when I simply nuked a couple of cities on islands (minimal pollution) and ended my conquest. Most often nuclear war is something I avoid because the polution can damage your productivity in the long run and in reality can slow your advance as it destroys the roads around a city.

    As an experiment I also nuked France at one point and found I could not destroy their nukes with my nukes. My philosophy was "Either I nuke them and get pollution or they nuke me and I get pollution." However, since no ICBMs were destroyed, it was overall a waste to nuke them for any reason. If anyone has input on nuclear wars in order to minimize damage to yourself by taking out your enemies nukes I'd like to hear it myself.
     

Share This Page