If you say that my data is biased and outdated then I expect something more. You can say, for example, which facts are incorrect, give your facts and say how correct facts can be interpreted in "non-biased" way. To say "everybody knows that it is not true" is not enough for discussion. That was my point. BTW I did not oppose the "social consensus". Look, scientific and social consensi are very different things. They have different subjects. Science provides some rational models and defines the range of their adequate application. That is all. Then society can use it to make some generalizations, to agree what is good and bad, right and wrong. Build some viewpoints and dogmas. For example science can try to prognose if given social phenomenon can exist under the given conditions or not. That is what i tried to do. Then society can try to agree who is superior, who is minor and who is "equal". That is what I did not try to do. I don't see any conflict with science in any of my statements. And science can not have consensus concerning the "equality" of men and women because it is a subject of jurisprudence and/or ideology, not of natural science. Err... Well... If there is an error in the program code guys on forum say: "here is an error!" and Kael changes the game, no? Or sometimes he can say: it is not bug but feature... That is the function of this forum.