I know that this is like insane but really, is oil important? Many alternatives are there like biofuel, ethanol, etc. Some says that oil will ran out by 2040. Is this true?
Oh sorry but I'm referring this naturally like letting nature work itself.
which combusts more efficiently, and with lower emissions than petrol or diesel.
National Geographic strikes again!<snip>
National Geographic strikes again!
I read an article about alternative fuels. There are a number of failures with corn, the largest being that there is not enough arable land available to produce the amount of ethanol fuel necessary to provide for the world. The other problem is that comparatively speaking, ethanol has a low energy efficiency. A better choice would be sugarcane, which burns more energy, cleaner, for less. Much of Brazil's current fuel alternatives consist of sugarcane products.
An experimental, although potentially superior alternative would be algae. It would not impact existing agricultural practices, and it is much simpler to grow and maintain. While theoretically it is the most energy-efficient alternative, the technology will only be commercially feasible if the overall cost is cheaper than oil.
My bet's on methane.
Yes.I know that this is like insane but really, is oil important?
Alternative implies that we can run our infrastructure on these with little to no impact on current economic trends. Therefore neither biofuel, ethanol nor etc. are alternatives.Many alternatives are there like biofuel, ethanol, etc.
Oil won't ever run out. We'll never extract it all. Some oil is so deep that it costs more energy to extract it then we will get in return.Some says that oil will ran out by 2040. Is this true?
) estimate we've reached peak extraction as of 2006. Estimated decline rates vary from 1 to 5% a year, forever. We may, however be able to plateu for a little while (maybe 'till 2011 or 12) and keep the world economy afloat. However, it is unlikely that within five years we'll be able to transition the whole world to a new primary fuel source in time. That would be nothing short of a miracle.We = someone else (maybe an economistThen we'd find another fuel?
?).


Oil won't ever run out. We'll never extract it all. Some oil is so deep that it costs more energy to extract it then we will get in return.
Many, if not most, experts (oil geologists not economists, remember I said "experts") estimate we've reached peak extraction as of 2006. Estimated decline rates vary from 1 to 5% a year, forever. We may, however be able to plateu for a little while (maybe 'till 2011 or 12) and keep the world economy afloat. However, it is unlikely that within five years we'll be able to transition the whole world to a new primary fuel source in time. That would be nothing short of a miracle.
Petrolium resources are some of the greatest material prices in human history.



What the hell does this mean?![]()

What natural reserves of liquid hydrogen do we have?My bet is on liquid hydrogen, because that's what is engineered to use and probably the only thing that will work without making it blow up. You can't just switch fuels around in liquid rocket engines.
Bunsen burners run on methane. What are you talking about?