I precisely quoted and bolded the Economist article where is said that the negative effects of fracking can be contained and limited so that Gasland can be prevented. I didn't said it was ecologically neutral source. Point that out if you can. And lastly, I presented the image because people like to think that fracking is like an oilfield or quarry digging where if massively devastates the landscape and destroys hectres upon hectres of enviromental land. Yes, that picture was a part of my argument. But it's a minor point. The main crux of it is that the biggest damage of fracking (gas leaks, water poisoning, the utterly idiotic earthquake creator) can be limited. You chose to focus on that and act as if I had forgotten about those points.