The Primary Chronicle reports that in the year 987, as the result of a consultation with his boyars, Vladimir sent envoys to study the religions of the various neighboring nations whose representatives had been urging him to embrace their respective faiths. The result is amusingly described in the following apocryphal anecdote. Of the Muslim Bulgarians of the Volga the envoys reported there is no gladness among them; only sorrow and a great stench. They also said that their religion was undesirable due to its taboo against alcoholic beverages and pork[citation needed]; supposedly, Vladimir said on that occasion: "Drinking is the joy of the Rus'."[citation needed]
Russian sources also describe Vladimir consulting with Jewish envoys (who may or may not have been Khazars), and questioning them about their religion but ultimately rejecting it, saying that their loss of Jerusalem was evidence of their having been abandoned by God.[citation needed]
Ultimately Vladimir settled on Christianity. In the gloomy churches of the Germans his emissaries saw no beauty; but at Hagia Sophia, where the full festival ritual of the Byzantine Church was set in motion to impress them, they found their ideal: "We no longer knew whether we were in heaven or on earth," they reported, "nor such beauty, and we know not how to tell of it."
I know the feeling.various neighboring nations whose representatives had been urging him to embrace their respective faiths.
There are places in which the Primary Chronicle isn't total crap?Yeah, the Primary Chronicle is total crap as far as that goes.
There are places in which the Primary Chronicle isn't total crap?
There are better primary sources?There are places in which the Primary Chronicle isn't total crap?
Well, no, but that doesn't disguise the poor quality of quite a bit of the Chronicle.There are better primary sources?
Also note that the Byzantines were significantly more threatened by Islamic powers than western Christians, so they had more motivation to create a new ally.Cheezy in another thread said:Ironically, when the Russia Grand Prince was seeking a religion to convert Russia to, he sent envoys to both Iran, Constantinople, and Rome, to study the religions. They liked Islam more than they did Orthodoxy, but Islam forbids the consumption of alcohol, so they went with Orthodox Christianity.
The Russians wanted a religion to unite their people. They decided against Judaism because there was a lot of hatred towards that religion and it was unpopular, they decided against Islam because it prohibits alcohol consumption and thus that left Christianity as the only religion, as for why Orthodoxy... I forget
Or at least this what my AP World History text book told me...
Volga Bulgars say hi.Islam's sphere of influence hadn't penetrated past the Balkans or Caucasus yet
The Rus states weren't oriental to begin with. They were founded by Swedes, after all.The adoption of Orthodoxy is probably the most significant factor in the Westernization of the west Asian states.
If you mention birch-bark letters I will slap you.they had a comparatively high rate of education
Volga Bulgars say hi.
The Rus states weren't oriental to begin with. They were founded by Swedes, after all.
What about them? A myth?If you mention birch-bark letters I will slap you.
"Eastern European" would have been rather more obvious. "West Asia" is usually taken to refer to the Middle East. The division between Europe and Asia is essentially defined by the traditional spheres of Christian and Islamic influence.I didn't say they were oriental. I was just using the term "west Asian" for lack of a better one coming to mind.
No, quite real. They just don't justify the more extravagant claims about them. They're mostly from the upper classes, though some are from artisans and craftsmen, and mostly deal with money in the early period and land in the late, which is to say that they're written by precisely the people you'd expect to be literate about precisely the thing you'd expect them to be writing about. They certainly don't indicate that there was mass, casual literacy among the peasantry, and don't necessarily even indicate widespread literacy among the urban population, though that is an attractive supposition.What about them? A myth?