Ziggy Stardust
Absolutely Sane
No! Because they are!
I don't claim to speak for anyone but me, but my problem wasn't that the moderation was "too strict", but that it was targeting form instead of content.People seem to be complaining the moderating is too lax now? The original reason for the split was alot of posters complaining the moderating was too strict. I thought it should be stricter, but I'm quite happy with how it turned out.
I don't claim to speak for anyone but me, but my problem wasn't that the moderation was "too strict", but that it was targeting form instead of content.
Someone can ignore any argument and be a blockhead and pollute every thread and won't be infracted, despite being extremely disruptive to the discussions.
But someone who just lash out (possibly at this very disruptive behaviour) will get an infraction, despite being much less disruptive.
Basically, the problem is that it reward annoying posters that respect superficial rules, and subtle trolls, rather than rewarding interesting participation.
I don't have much problem with the split, Just a few posters I don't like and one mod who seems to target quackers unduly. Birdj does a good job I think, tells posters to cool it before handing out bans or points.
People seem to be complaining the moderating is too lax now? The original reason for the split was alot of posters complaining the moderating was too strict. I thought it should be stricter, but I'm quite happy with how it turned out.
The Tavern was my loophole. I don't think I get any more.
@Hobbs: I used JR as an example, not to create loopholes directed at him, but because he has a long history here and a very identifiable posting style that has gotten him into trouble now and again. He is an example of the complexity of moderating here. I also figured that he would not mind if I did use him as an example. And thank you for all your other points.
@All: I expect that we will post a survey to formalize your interest in change.
It really doesn't matter. Mods should focus on fixing problems, not problem posters. Sure the problems we are talking about may be because of a few posters, but any rules should apply equally to everyone and all should have chances to change their behavior. Of course, some posters have never changed their behavior in response to any corrective or disciplinary action and that's really how they got to be a problem. But that's their problem.
Please read my lolwtf massive post of glorious victory(tm). You're asking a question that's largely beside the points I made.Can't you just stop reading those posts? I don't find <snip> much of a problem because I very rarely read his posts, I mean what compels you to reply hobbsyo, why do you seem to get so angry about it?
Please read my lolwtf massive post of glorious victory(tm).
Please read my lolwtf massive post of glorious victory(tm). You're asking a question that's largely beside the points I made.
Then shut up.
Yes, you're a master troll baiter. Got something else to contribute?Reason: see how easy it is!