You should sell that to TV.
I don't really see how an argument can be made in favor of closing the Chamber that could not be made regarding closing down A&E.Until recently I would have agreed, but some of those threads are actually slipping off the forum entirely because they haven't received any posts in 2 weeks. That's the default forum view - it only shows the threads that have been posted in in the last 2 weeks by default, so now there's only like 12 threads left... I wish it wasn't that way as I like the Chamber, but that's how it went...
What is gained by merging all these forums with the Tavern?I forgot that place even existed... I don't think S&T should be an open forum either. Roll it back in with OT. We don't have the traffic to support so many subforums anymore.
That's obviously not true for the people who post there. And shouldn't that be what counts?I forgot that place even existed...
There is something to be said for the power of forum default settings when it comes to ease of use issues.You can set your own preferences as to how many threads you want to see per page, and how many posts per page, and how far back you want to go.
I forgot that place even existed... I don't think S&T should be an open forum either. Roll it back in with OT. We don't have the traffic to support so many subforums anymore.
Not saying i am in favor of this. But i can say that i could see some sense in merging A&E and the Chamber (and give the whole thing a new name of course).I actually suggested that in the survey, that S&T needs to be rolled into OT (the chamber specifically, but the tavern if the chamber goes).
As to why: it would drive up traffic overall and attract more users (imo) if you have a hopping subforum or two instead of several nearly-dead ones. Also, as Ziggy previously stated, the merger of forums means that different types of threads inside the subforum can inform each other in ways they can't when the two groups of posters mutually-ignore each other to stay solely in their tiny (and dying) walled gardens.
I have been saying that. Or at least I haven't been advocating other people losing their favorite forums.I don't really see how an argument can be made in favor of closing the Chamber that could not be made regarding closing down A&E.
And afaik the case in favor of closing down A&E has been thoroughly argued - and dismissed.
Of course this is true for the argument you just made:
In the default view (2 weeks) A&E has 15 active threads right now.
In the default view (2 weeks) the Chamber has 16 active threads right now.
Also:
4 of the A&E threads are 10 pages and longer.
5 of the Chamber threads are 10 pages and longer.
Also:
Both forums have generated roughly the same ammount of content, despite A&E existing a lot longer.
Also:
Why is noone among the A&E people who vehemently protested the possible closure of "their" forum coming forward here and now saying something like "oh, and you shouldn't do it to other people either"?
I would love to have a subforum just for American political discussions, and then one for everything else. But I have a feeling most people would be against that.
That's because nobody can find them. Sometimes they're 10+ pages down!I think those threads died a while ago.