Ravensfire
Cultural discussion was held, but all citizens wanted military units and settlers and a few workers, and I took the hint and did not call for any tempels due to our early wine and expansion policy. In fact, 30 March, today, no temple has been needed, and we are short of both garrisons, escorts and scouts, not to mention a military.
Most people agree on that, and making this a personal attack on the Culture Consul, an office where both candidates made it an issue to go for going Lighthouse is nothing but preposterous and counterproductive.
I also posted a Culture discussion the President himself commended, and none of the criteria for building a temple or wonder was met (we have not literature yet).
That this vile accusation comes at the very end of the term, where no cultural builds have been needed, requested or wanted in Term One, but a majority wanting the Great Lighthouse and a minority split in the Great Library and no wonders proves that the Culture Consul has followed the Will of The People.
The polled long term technology plan also dictated which scope of wonders we could choose between, and I saw no other wonder debate raised by citizens.
So I can only say that Ravensfires isolated criticism can be counted as null, void and non-valid, and can at best be considered a need for putting a non-existant blame somewhere and at worst be a natural product of a conspicious political behavior.
Moderator Action: 5 days for continuing to bait Ravensfire into a flamewar. You can add to a discussion without attacking other members.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889