hgengstrom
Chieftain
Does anyone know how to crash an AI run Democracy? I've been starving the enemy capitol and I finally captured it but the AI never seems to have trouble maintaining Democracy. Any ideas? Thanks.
Overthrowing a democracy
- Thread starter hgengstrom
- Start date
Use spies to sabatoge colosiums & cathedrals in a city where his happiness is marginal. If a city riots 2 turn in a row, a democracy is ovethrown.
------------------
Gauis Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
Pontificator Pedanticus
Older, richer, and wiser than you.
Did i mention that I love the spellchecker?
------------------
Gauis Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
Pontificator Pedanticus
Older, richer, and wiser than you.
Did i mention that I love the spellchecker?
hgengstrom
Chieftain
Will spies work against a Democracy?
Pikeman
Chieftain
Yes they will
MrSparkle
Warlord
Democracy only prevents bribry from spies, though i cant see why this is so...
------------------
I am disrespectful to Dirt! Can you not see that I am serious?
------------------
I am disrespectful to Dirt! Can you not see that I am serious?
There is no such thing as bribery in Democracies<IMG SRC="http://forums.civfanatics.com/ubb/wink.gif" border=0>
One would think that Democratic Capitolists would be more susceptible to bribes.Its that way in real life.
[This message has been edited by Smash (edited January 31, 2001).]
One would think that Democratic Capitolists would be more susceptible to bribes.Its that way in real life.
[This message has been edited by Smash (edited January 31, 2001).]
MrSparkle
Warlord
In that case it should be possible to bribe units and cities under a Demorcacy, only its costs heaps to do and then the citizen revolt afterwards!
------------------
I am disrespectful to Dirt! Can you not see that I am serious?
------------------
I am disrespectful to Dirt! Can you not see that I am serious?
FearlessLeader2
Fundamentalist Loon
Then what would be the advantage of a Democracy? I mean, no corruption, Courthouse = 1 happy, those are nice, but double unhappiness for military units out of the city more than pays for those. Not being able to bribe Democracies is a good compromise. I think that ability should belong to Fundamentalism though. Fundamentalists should NEVER be susceptible to bribery, especially Fanatics!!
TimTheEnchanter
I...am...an Enchanter!
That's just what we need, something to make fundamentalism an even more powerful war government!
------------------
There are some who call me...Tim
------------------
There are some who call me...Tim
Loaf Warden
(no party affiliation)
True, but that's a good point. If they're so fanatical, why should they abandon their God and their High Priest just because you give them a little gold? A politique, yes, easily, but not a FUNDAMENTALIST FANATIC! I've known some people who were borderline religious fanatics, and I can't imagine them abandoning their ways so easily.
"Here, I'll give you two hundred bucks if you spit on a cross and start preaching agnosticism."
"Deal!"
Yeah, right! I think you should be able to bribe regular units of a Fundamentalism. You'll always find soldiers in any army who disagree with the policies of their ruler, or who are simply greedy enough to consider a personal monetary gain greater then their ruler's Cause. But not Fanatics. They should be immune to bribery just by virtue of being Fanatics.
[This message has been edited by Loaf Warden (edited February 04, 2001).]
"Here, I'll give you two hundred bucks if you spit on a cross and start preaching agnosticism."
"Deal!"
Yeah, right! I think you should be able to bribe regular units of a Fundamentalism. You'll always find soldiers in any army who disagree with the policies of their ruler, or who are simply greedy enough to consider a personal monetary gain greater then their ruler's Cause. But not Fanatics. They should be immune to bribery just by virtue of being Fanatics.
[This message has been edited by Loaf Warden (edited February 04, 2001).]
Cunobelin Of Hippo
Site Pachyderm
Maybe Fundamentalist cities could form cults if you convinced them to defect, because their leaders are being disloyal to their gods? Did that make any sense?
FearlessLeader2
Fundamentalist Loon
Yeah, they could, but unless the bribing society is another Fundie, they're not gonna have any power, so where is the percentage? At least at home, the rulers professed SOME religion, even if it wasn't quite right...
And Fanatic units definitely should be immune to bribery. That would be about the only reason to make the worthless little doofuses. I mean 4/4/1 2/1? Puh-leese! Riflemen are equal defenders, better attackers, and Alpine Troops ought to be available by then, making both obsolete. Fanatics need something besides cheapness to endear themselves to me. <Shrug>
FL
And Fanatic units definitely should be immune to bribery. That would be about the only reason to make the worthless little doofuses. I mean 4/4/1 2/1? Puh-leese! Riflemen are equal defenders, better attackers, and Alpine Troops ought to be available by then, making both obsolete. Fanatics need something besides cheapness to endear themselves to me. <Shrug>
FL
