Permanent Hall of Fame Update I

[Dianthus]

How come civ 3 hof had #1 score sign? hey also had #1 fastest finish so why not have uit here too?

#1 in Time and score http://hof.civfanatics.net/civ3/game_info.php?entryID=869

#1 in Conquest http://hof.civfanatics.net/civ3/game_info.php?entryID=1577

etc.

Because since then Dianthus has been making trouble in the HOF staff forum about how we haven't got a method for determining the real #1 fastest finish (I.e. taking into account the difficulty/mapsize), and that since we can't do it we shouldn't make half-assed fudged attempts to compare games at different difficulties/mapsizes.

[Edit] I.e. that #1 Conquest for 1577 implies it's the best conquest game. Personally I think that there are lots of other better Conquest games, such as http://hof.civfanatics.net/civ3/game_info.php?entryID=758 [/Edit]

 

[Kalleyao]

Ok...... It was just a suggestion. And my point wasn't to compare games, it was to make it easier for people to see whether it's fastest or not.

 

[Dianthus]

Ok...... It was just a suggestion. And my point wasn't to compare games, it was to make it easier for people to see whether it's fastest or not.

I've added a rankings section to the game info page. It also now shows the opponents as well.

 

[Kalleyao]

Great.