@ Azale - Why? Because most of TV-enhanced politicians can be described as spineless. They enjoy excessive spending (parties, "conferences", hiring family members, ludicrous waste of public money, one particular moron was recently exposed "using" 200l of fuel per 100km - why not, taxpayers will pay as usual) as long as it does not become major scandal (minor they apparently can handle...). But they'd be utterly horrified and rather retire than say: "Sorry, voters, we need to buy new, really expensive planes". Until today, with crisis-talking chased by ever-growing populism this would be considered suicide. And a field day for various rags. Considering most of our politicians appeal to the voters at rag-reader level (well, it's easier, isn't it?), you can imagine the result.
So? So amazingly, no one had the courage to advocate such spendings openly for friggin years. You can even hear history laughing now - some of those people might have prevented their own deaths by showing some stones earlier. Sadly, many more died instead. And NOW we will certainly get new planes - with a disgusting amount of hypocrisy as a bonus.
@TheLastOne36: ever tried to explain meaning of "" ?
offtopic: "get near them and blow them up"??? with what? lances? sticky grenades no one actually had? blazing charge with molotov's coctails? Regardless, I think World History section could use some amusement instead
So? So amazingly, no one had the courage to advocate such spendings openly for friggin years. You can even hear history laughing now - some of those people might have prevented their own deaths by showing some stones earlier. Sadly, many more died instead. And NOW we will certainly get new planes - with a disgusting amount of hypocrisy as a bonus.
@TheLastOne36: ever tried to explain meaning of "" ?
offtopic: "get near them and blow them up"??? with what? lances? sticky grenades no one actually had? blazing charge with molotov's coctails? Regardless, I think World History section could use some amusement instead