Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Micaelis Rex, Nov 23, 2005.
3: War on Terror, yes, Iraq, no.
4: No on both War on Terror and Iraq.
Hmm, its almost never exactly the choice that fits you, is it?
I'll go with B.
I don't suppose I can say maybe?
I'll go with no
Good luck on your paper
A, as bad as it sounds, countries will always go to war for self interest above all else.
Afghan yes, Iraq No.
No, the Iraq war has been very porrly executed(thank you mr. rumsfeld )
1. United States
2. Position B: even though my true stance is that diplomacy works best at the point of a bayonet.
3. Yes, because if we don't stop them other nations just sit on their hands. And going to war with them drains their funds and overall resources lessening the likelyhood of another attack like 9/11.
4. I am a little letdown we didn't find any WMD's. And I know, judging by the way he ruled his country, that Suddam would never allow terrorists to do anything in Iraq, much less fund or train them. But I do believe that gasing, shooting, torturing, and the religious/ethnic cleansing of Iraq's citizens to be a horrible atrocity and I, for one, am glad that we removed that SOB.
I choose A.
Pretty much, yes.
Are you including Iraq under "War on Terror" or not? That's a rather important distinction.
3. Afghanistan, Yes, Iraq, no
Separate names with a comma.