Politicans edit Wikipedia to save face

GinandTonic

Saphire w/ Schweps + Lime
Joined
May 25, 2005
Messages
8,898
Tories admit to Wiki-alteration

Auntie said:
The Tories have admitted a member of staff altered a Wikipedia entry on the artist Titian after a row between Gordon Brown and David Cameron.

During exchanges at prime minister's questions, the Tory leader mocked Mr Brown for talking of Titian at 90, when he said in fact he had died age 86.

Shortly afterwards a Wikipedia user registered at Tory HQ moved Titian's birth date forward by four years.

The party admitted an "over-eager" member of staff had been responsible.

Wikipedia is an online encyclopaedia founded in 2001 and based on wikis - open source software which lets anyone alter an entry.

The issue of Titian was raised during prime minister's questions when David Cameron referred to comments made by Mr Brown last month at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Mr Brown had said: "I'm reminded of the story of Titian, who's the great painter who reached the age of 90, finished the last of his nearly 100 brilliant paintings, and he said at the end of it, 'I'm finally beginning to learn how to paint,' and that is where we are."

He was speaking in the context of people learning how to deal with the current economic crisis.

'Incorrect entry'

In the House of Commons Mr Cameron said, to laughter from Conservative MPs: "You told us the other day you were like Titian aged 90. The fact is Titian died at 86."

Shortly afterwards several people emailed the BBC taking issue with this claim, saying there was no certainty about the age at which Titian died. BBC 2's Daily Politics also reported that his Wikipedia entry suggested he had lived to 91.

At 1234 GMT, shortly after PMQs ended, the page was changed by someone registered as being at the Conservative Party's HQ in London.

The artist's date of death was altered from 27 August 1576 to 27 August 1572.

A Conservative spokesman said: "This was an over-eager member of staff putting right an incorrect entry on Wikipedia."

At 1229 GMT, another user - registered as being in Sutton, Surrey - altered Titian's date of birth from c.1485 to c.1490.

This, when combined with the intervention by the Conservative HQ user's intervention, would have made his lifespan 81 or 82 years.

Caught with their trousers down, or just trying to correct realities well known left-wing bias?
 
Was it actually Cameron doing the editing? He's a fool for talking about something he doesn't know...
but politicians do that all the time.
 
In the US, didn't wikipedia ban users with Congressional office IPs from editing?
 
How can anyone possibly be so stupid to believe he can get away with this ?
 
Who the hell talks about Titian anyway? Venus of Urbino is nice but it's really not the typical fodder for political discourse.
 
This has been going on in Australia for years. Usually altering the politician's own biography to include them saving children from drowning and not being caught visiting underage male prostitutes, or changing the opposing party's wiki page to say they would legalise rape and make the national religion Islam, nothing like changing a third-party's wiki.
 
Which specific articles have been edited like that? Are they still up, or have they been corrected. I imagine they might be a good read.


That reminded me of overhearing someone freshman year talking about the wikipedia article on a friends small town Alabama baptist church, which supposedly requires all the members to sacrifice their children to Moloch.
 
Which specific articles have been edited like that? Are they still up, or have they been corrected.
You can still read them even after they've been corrected; look at the "history" tab.
 
Which specific articles have been edited like that? Are they still up, or have they been corrected. I imagine they might be a good read.


That reminded me of overhearing someone freshman year talking about the wikipedia article on a friends small town Alabama baptist church, which supposedly requires all the members to sacrifice their children to Moloch.
John Howard's was "corrected" by Liberal Party employees about twice daily until his defeat, for months. As Dachs said, you can still read them anyway, it may take a while to find them though.

My personal favourite was the ACTU article which alleged that the anti-Work Choices campaign was funded by Russia. Dirty Communists.
 
I totally understand why my professor hates wikipedia now, he went a screaming rant about it half way through lecture.
 
I totally understand why my professor hates wikipedia now, he went a screaming rant about it half way through lecture.

LOL I can see that. I hate how people just blindly repeat anything they read on wiki, then get really upset if someone edited in a way they don't like.
 
Art Historians and their students (like me) love him.
Yeah, he wasn't bad, but I mean, these are politicians. The point I was getting at is that Brit politics must be bloody weird if they mention Titian in regular discourse.
 
Back
Top Bottom