SolInvictus
Warlord
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2013
- Messages
- 183
I'm not saying the bad, but I'm not a fan. I think that more leaders is a better way to spend their time. I'm not a fond of how many civs there are in game vs. how many leaders, because I think it doesn't do the civs justice to have one leader, and interesting mechanics that could mean different things don't get the attention they deserve.
A return to multiple leaders is one of my favorite things about Civ VI. I really wish they would launch every civ with multiple leaders; no offense to Gilgabro, but I'd rather have a Sumer that launches with warmonger Shulgi, aesthete Gudea, and tavern-keeper Kubaba.
Last edited: