1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

PolyCast Episode 306: "Up To Interpretation"

Discussion in 'Civ6 - General Discussions' started by DanQ, Apr 29, 2018.

  1. DanQ

    DanQ Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,722
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Over to you. The three hundred-and-sixth episode of PolyCast, "Up To Interpretation", features regular co-hosts Daniel "DanQ" Quick, Stephanie "Makahlua", Philip "TheMeInTeam" Bellew and Jason "MegaBearsFan" Grade with returning guest Michael "UberMarklar" Bryant. It carries a runtime of 59m59s.

    The summary of topics is as follows:

    - 02m34s | News
    The "Spring 2018 Developer Update" for Civilization: Rise and Fall arrived, but not the patch it highlights... not yet.
    - 26m25s | Open Mic
    For all the conversation about one topic on Episode 305, the bit on another is what takes centre stage.
    - 33m03s | Forum Talk
    Getting to the bottom of inconsistent, even conflicting, trading practices by CivVI: R&F's Artificial Intelligence (AI) and dealing with getting war declared on you by an ally (44m26s) lead, understanding joint attacks from AI for divergent or even no discernible reason follows (46m59s).

    - Intro/Outro | Assorted
    Herding sheeple and coffee dunking.

    PolyCast is a bi-weekly audio production recording live every other Saturday throughout the year, in an ongoing effort to give the Civilization community an interactive voice; sibling show ModCast focuses on Civ modding, TurnCast on Civ multiplay.
     
    Uberfrog likes this.
  2. alancsilver

    alancsilver Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    142
    Dan:

    Looks like there might be an error with the RSS feed.
    My podcast player is reporting an error and I am seeing this

    error on line 32 at column 413: EntityRef expecting ';'
     
  3. DanQ

    DanQ Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,722
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Thanks for the heads-up -- corrected.

    Enjoy the listen! :)
     
  4. alancsilver

    alancsilver Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    142
    Awesome! Thanks much for the quick fix!
     
  5. DanQ

    DanQ Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,722
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Welcome... pardon any inconvenience.

    Also, "quick" in "quick fix"... :D (My last name is Quick.)
     
  6. Uberfrog

    Uberfrog Warlord

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,353
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    England
    It's nice that Firaxis have delayed the Spring Patch enough to keep the speculations and preliminary discussion in this podcast relevant over a week after recording! :p So often patches sneak in under the PolyCast radar, but this time we have plenty of time to sit and wait. I enjoyed the panel's discussion about the forthcoming patch... now we just need it to arrive so we can judge it properly!

    I think aircraft and aerodromes are in a difficult place to balance as units on the tactical map. It does seem harsh (and expensive) that every air unit gets instantly deleted as soon as so much as a Warrior walks across the runway, but at the same time I think a systems of hit points or some defence on behalf of the aircraft (as TMIT rightly points out, if this was based on melee combat strength the air unit would always put up a heck of a fight, if not win outright) would turn aerodromes into quasi-Encampments that are extremely punishing to attack. Being in a position to raid an airstrip should be a tactical victory for the invader, and I have to say I probably lean towards MadDjinn's argument that it's up to you to defend your planes before the enemy gets to hit them. But I'd settle for the air units fleeing to any available slot in another city as suggested on this episode.

    Also regarding diplomacy screens and trading, I couldn't agree more with the suggestion that incoming trade offers (and in fact any form of interaction) should appear as a notification first, instead of interrupting you unannounced between turns. It's a surprisingly obnoxious feature that really shouldn't still be there.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2018
    Victoria likes this.
  7. Victoria

    Victoria Regina Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    7,489
    Was a shame that deployed fighters on airbases were not discussed also, its like half a discussion based on the knowledge in the thread.
     
  8. legalizefreedom

    legalizefreedom Inefficiency Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    488
    Location:
    Texas
    I'm not so much against whatever way the air units ground combat is decided, but the idea that they are treated like civilians... The worst part is that apparently no one even knew it was like this until it happened. That's telling in two ways: it doesn't happen very often and was never properly communicated anywhere (add it to the list, right TMIT?). This adds credence to my theory that it hasn't been fully considered by the devs.
     
  9. DanQ

    DanQ Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,722
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    It's the evening before the recording of the next episode, and still no patch. So we can anticipate a (near) free-from-conversation on the topic!
     
    Uberfrog likes this.

Share This Page