CNN, MSNBC and Fox all broadcasted her name. They're not THAT inhibited.
CNN, MSNBC and Fox all broadcasted her name. They're not THAT inhibited.
Check your white middle class hetero privilege at the door mate.Where does this happen, exactly? As a white male living in mittelamerika, I've never felt particularly marginalized. That's anecdotal, yes, but "too often" I think suggests that there is a comparably bulky subset of issues about which nothing is done - but of all the things I can compare white male problems to, I think the problems faced by women and minorities of all kind are more numerous and certainly more ignored.
Well even among western countries there are all sorts of problems but that doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of the problems occurring in other places. Many parts of the world have starvation on a regular basis, disease, lack of water, local warfare, etc. I could go on and on. Just because the world might be 'nicer than ever before' doesn't mean we shouldn't be aware of our problems and try to improve things.
Why do those 'feed the children that are starving in a third world country' commercials make you feel guilty? Because they're completely true, and you realize your life is very privileged compared to theirs.
Regardless of how good the world may be, we should always be working to improve it. Because you see, the world is either getting better or it is getting worse. It does not stay the same. I for one want to see the world getting better.![]()
That is a libelous accusation, Owen would never make a verbal accusation through a written medium.Slander.
Wrong again. I think rape culture is a real thing, and is a problem that needs to be addressed.
Is it wrong to point out the glass cellar when the glass ceiling is discussed?It's a movement which belittles the feminist movement and ignores the pressing fact that, hey, women are still unequal. Bbbbut there's stigma about being a male nurse!. Please
You make the same random prattlings about how men get raped too followed by an entirely unrelated rant about suicide. I read wrote. Your argument was essentially if 1 then a ergo .9999999....
1) that has no relevance to the issue of rape culture. 2) your argument really doesn't follow.
They aren't more likely to succumb, they more more likely to fail.Here's a problem.
Men commit suicide more often than women. A majority of suicides are men. That is not controversial.
But that does not in itself indicate that suicide effects men to a correspondingly disproportionate degree. All it indicates is that more suicides (or attempted suicides) involve men. It could in principle be the case that suicidal thoughts effect more women, and that the majority of people affected by suicidal thoughts are women, but they are for whatever reason less likely to succumb to those thoughts.
Presuming that when we say something is a "men's issue" or a "women's issue", we mean that it effects living men or women, then it would have to be demonstrated that suicide effects either of those genders to a significantly disproportionate extent, not simply that it kills them, and that isn't something that we have any solid reason to believe is the case.
(All this, of course, assumes that statistical prevalence is enough to gender an issue, of which I'm quite sceptical. But it's sufficient to point out that even accepting this premise, CTD is drawing spurious conclusions.)
Aren't you ignoring attempted suicide?
(Don't know if this has been brought up, backtracked only a page or so)
Furthermore, I have yet to see a high school coach who was above average when it came to teaching. There are probably a few, but there are certainly not very many of them based on my own personal experiences. This is particularly true if they majored in some absurd major like phys ed instead of a legitimate academic subject. I certainly didn't ever have one teaching an honors class that I attended, or any class for that matter when there were no honors classes. They seemed to teach the classes where there were a lot of jocks and other students who had difficulties passing for some odd reason.
Why on earth would we look at this as if it has a "side?" Did anyone at any point actually argue that what the convicted did was acceptable? This isn't the adversarial criminal trial anymore. That's decided and the finders of fact and law have spoken. Now we all lose. Everyone involved. Everyone impacted. Everyone witnessing. All loss.
The problem is they were focusing on the rapists loss rather than the victims loss.
Ok, I'm not going to watch a 6 minute video about sexual assault while I'm at work and I'll concede any point I have if this blip is insane. I see zero problem(in general) with a story about society's massive failure in regards to these young men whom we allowed to become what they have become.
To be fair, the way she was dressed... man, she was asking for it.Justification? Really, did they take it there? Did the news story say that the sexual assault was justified?
Some people have this perception that because men are over-represented politically that men rule collectively which is simply not true...
I feel like an inordinate amount of this thread is being spent explaining pretty basic things to you.
Well, at least we know how seriously to take your pronouncements in future.
The post addresses somebody who thinks "We're a Winner" is much of a muchness with the Horst-Wessel-Lied. What do you expect?
And Public Enemy are basically the same as Skrewdriver, yeah, we've established that you're a fellow of what I will politely call "idiosyncratic" opinions.
I'm saying that you're a crank. Has that been less than clear?
That was the point. You whined about feminism for like 10 pages in one thread. You're still saying exactly the same things today, so I hardly think it's "old hat". I don't keep grudges, I'm just pointing out that you're a misogynist and talking at length with you about why rape culture is a Thing is an entirely pointless endeavor.
Exactly, that was my point. Since you aren't crusading about this issue in other places, why arbitrarily bring it up here?
Oh snarky! I think I can do snarky.
No, that didn't occur to me at all. Why thank you for pointing that illusive fact out to me.
*looks left* "Hey! Is that an exit?"
Well I can get behind torching the entire town too in that case.
Why do people care what the media says anymore?
Furthermore, I have yet to see a high school coach who was above average when it came to teaching. There are probably a few, but there are certainly not very many of them based on my own personal experiences. This is particularly true if they majored in some absurd major like phys ed instead of a legitimate academic subject. I certainly didn't ever have one teaching an honors class that I attended, or any class for that matter when there were no honors classes. They seemed to teach the classes where there were a lot of jocks and other students who had difficulties passing for some odd reason.
For what it's worth, nearly every football coach in Ohio has a Masters Degree, since nearly all of them are teach high school.
First of all, I hope it is clear that no penetration of a vagina by a penis occurred here. People keep using the word "rape" to discuss what occurred here when it is actually the crime of sexual assault by the definition used in most places.
No excuses for rape. The apologetics in this thread are ridiculous.
So its sad because their jock lives have been destroyed? I mean just because he can kick a ball he should be pitied on? I mean he wasn't close to finding the cure for AIDS, so he deserves some pity.....what is wrong with society? Its the same with pop stars......