- Feb 24, 2020
I think a good solution would be to give more time.n this case, it was a counterproposal that was much larger than the proposal, and amended with very little time before the closing of the proposal phase. I can't really think of a good way to implement a method to ensure that there is enough time for people to propose counterproposals to counterproposals, given a hard deadline for the Proposal Phase.
I think that we'll have to just ... vote on whether the large counterproposal is a net positive to the game, and then people can create subsequent proposals to change it next session.
I also agree with @Stalker0 that 1 month for feedback probably isn't enough.
So, maybe lengthening the periods across the board? Gives more time for more thought out proposals as well.