I watched a video online of the GDC talk Firaxis gave about how efficient their new graphics coding/engine was and though they didn't commit to it, they did make a big deal of how they wanted to (and would) reach all the customers who'd want to play in transit and other such situations where they only had a fairly low powered machine with integrated graphics...
The stuff they indicated would have to be deactivated were primarily water effects/animations, idle animations and depth fog.
I was holding off pre-ordering until I watched this talk.... as I said, they didn't commit to making it run on integrated graphics, but that was the punchline of the second half of the hour long talk.Can you post a link to this video? I would really like to watch it. Because every time someone posts about requirements someone (me) brings up the integrated cards and they always say that they REALLY want to get this on integrated cards.
I watched a video online of the GDC talk Firaxis gave about how efficient their new graphics coding/engine was and though they didn't commit to it, they did make a big deal of how they wanted to (and would) reach all the customers who'd want to play in transit and other such situations where they only had a fairly low powered machine with integrated graphics...
The stuff they indicated would have to be deactivated were primarily water effects/animations, idle animations and depth fog.
Though I have a better laptop than with integrated graphics, it is a few years old and I was holding off pre-ordering until I watched this talk.... as I said, they didn't commit to making it run on integrated graphics, but that was the punchline of the second half of the hour long talk, so I think they've got to feel fairly confident about delivering.
AD712: check out this thread. The link to GDC is in there.
I run Civ IV on my laptop with integrated graphics from last year at full (or almost full) settings.Can Civ4 be played without a dedicated graphics card? I haven't been without one in at least 5 years, even on my laptops. (An aside: It's very easy to get high performance laptops for cheap. I got a P-7811 for $800 refurbished on eBay. Been going strong for 3 years now).
I run Civ IV on my laptop with integrated graphics from last year at full (or almost full) settings.
Hopefully I won't need a new computer for Civ V.
Hard to tell without running the game. I am sure it will, but I do not know how choppy it will be. Some people want 100% smooth gameplay, others figure sionce it is a TBS they require less FPS to be happy.So, what about this kind of system:
i5-430m
Hd 5650
5400RMP HDD
4 GB memory
Think that would be enough for playing on "high"?
So, what about this kind of system:
i5-430m
Hd 5650
5400RMP HDD
4 GB memory
Think that would be enough for playing on "high"?
I have the exact same thing. I have a core2duo E8500 @~3.1Ghz, whis is enough to even run CoD4:MW2 with everything on high and such and get a good framerate, but I suspect civ5 will be more demanding. I am unsure if I should upgrade though. I dislike larger maps because I do not want to work too much in order to win, and conquering the world is more of the same. Also I do not want to play longer games becuase at some point I feel uncertain and then I often start a new game. I like standard maps because they are over faster, maybe in two sittings.For larger maps and late-game gameplay, the main things that will count will be RAM and CPU. In PromZeus' system I suspect the processor would be the first thing to bottleneck in such situations, but whether it does or not depends on how the game and engine is programmed. Assuming they've fixed memory allocation for civ5, we can hope the game won't be so RAM-demanding as civ4 was notorious for. I'd imagine that most people will be CPU-limited when playing civ5 - something that is different to most modern games which are limited mainly by the graphics card.
I still haven't bothered to upgrade past a dual core cpu yet because there would be little gain other than in very particular applications like video editing and such. I suspect civ5 will be one of the first games (at least that I've played) where a quad core will produce substantially better results than a dual core.
With the Strategic View being confirmed, and the fact you can play the game exclusively from the Strategic View, it would be very nice if there was an installation option for Strategic View Only that cut out all the eye candy so you could actually install it on a moderate laptop that doesn't have 6-9 GB of hard drive space available.
What socket are you using?
An nvidia 9800GT 512MB. It i a good card, but not to todays standards. It manage sto play newer shooters without hickups though.Out of curiosity, what graphics card are you using?
pgrade everything at once. In order to make the most of the later video cards you need a good cpu anyway, so upgrading to a great video card in a crappy pc will not net you that much difference.If I'm smart (yeah right) I'll upgrade Video first as that's easy and transferable.