Shattered
Lord of Utopia
Our platform is done, it just needs some editing.
If I may be so bold I wish to ask the first question:
I am not affiliated but that does not mean disenfranchised so as a legal citizen I still have my right to ask.
What are these factions going to do about those of us who wish not to join the "established" factions? What are our rights in this great land?
If we said we are "open" and "flexible" and "democratic", it would be true within the factions themselves and indeed true when it comes to these Faction elections.
I suggest you figure out what core interest do you have in this game. I for example come from the Warlords Faction, but we decided to ally with the Philosophers Legion Faction and the Atlantis Faction, which suggests a triad of Philosophy, Religion and War-mongering, where the Tribal Council is a different type of Faction, as it is highlighting gold and building projects.
I do think that neither faction got more or less democracy, more or less flexibility, more or less structure, more or less transparency, more or less vision and creativity and more or less stimulating and energetic communities.
It boils down to what you like and where you feel you fit in, where you vote, not about factions overbidding each other in terms of claimed libertarian/democratic qualities. So, first I would ask about how each faction platform want to go about the game, then ask for independent rights.
Ahhh...but the Tribal Council Faction is "...'open'...and 'flexible' and 'democratic'..." and not only in our faction but towards all citizens. We indeed see the tribal council as the earliest form of a democratic government, one where the people select people to govern over or to represent them based on perceived and actual abilities, deeds, and actions. Indeed if you look at our platform, you will see that we do not even specify that the Chief nor the position of any council seat, not even our designated player, has to be a faction member. We would choose the best person, based on merit and ability, to include their availability.
I feel that the differences between our platforms speaks for itself. Clearly, flexible doctrine, coupled with the simplistic organization of terms allows freedom to thrive, and allows diverse personalities to optomize their benefit to the community. Participation is key in a game like this. You do not have to be an active poster, but you simply must engage yourself in the issues of the times in order to get the maximum benefit of fun from this experience. It is true that certain factions place a great deal of reward to their members over non-members (see the Triad platform concerning land-use rules) and then look at ours, from the Tribal Council Faction platform...in fact, it's so short and uncomplicated that I'll just post it here for you, Italianajt, and all other citizens of this budding civilization:
"Land Usage
* Land is granted by the will of the Chief to his most honorable and deserving subjects/tribe members.
* Land may be passed on to another tribe member.
* Land may be taken away by the Chief.
* What roll land usage will play, other than a signifier of honor within the tribe/faction, in the future, has yet to be determined.
That's it. Transparency and the path to victory begins with simplicity and the efficient rule of law that guides but does not bind its citizenry.
A couple of questions...
How are each of your factions/ coalitions despotic or otherwise in tune with the perceived need to roleplay governments that are not so democratic, as per the limitations in the game rules?
What allowances, if any, will be made for the new circumstances in this world as opposed to previous worlds?
* Members of the council are chosen by the leader with consensus of the council, and of the tribe.
* The council does not normally interfere with day to day activities, except for dispute resolution, to give general advice, and in times of emergency.
* A good leader and council will usually maintain their position by limiting their use of power to that which is necessary, and by being responsive to the tribe's needs.
From my initial post on Tribal Council, which also happened to be the very first post about a specific faction...
What this means:
- Your input matters when choosing council members.
- The Chief and council won't interfere with your fun. In fact, we'll go out of our way to leave you plenty of time to do whatever you want to do. Take a good look at the "reasons to stop game play" list in the platform.
- Being responsive to the tribe's needs means, if you question an action we will listen, and give a respectful, direct response. You'll never see a response like "don't worry all will be revealed in time."
- As for who wants to allow polling and who doesn't just take a look at the poll subforum. Same thing for who wants to lock you into a permanent course of action and who wants to grant you flexibility.
1. The Chief is chosen by the members of our faction: As a voter you only choose the faction, not the leader. The Triad leaders have already been announced, you can question them directly. But the Tribal Council still hasn’t determined who their leader is, and I can assure you that you, as an independent, are not one of the candidates for the leader of the Tribal Council. Power is held in their absolute hands.
you should know that we will make 40-60 turns for a term within a month, just to create the basis for setting up new factions, new ideas and so on. This predictability of progression is guaranteed, which means you will not be surprised to see the game come to a grind, or if someone took way too many turns because they got excited. Steady and well-documented progression is a must.
Sessions will typically run fluidly until one of the following happens (the list is just an example, and just a pause for RP reasons, but depending on what happens, could result in a true stop for discussions), but be no more than 10 turns long, with a 2-5 day break. The expectation is to complete 50 turns.
but there is not much roleplay from the tribals camp, and their platform is void of personality and full of generic statements about "flexibility", "openness", "democracy" and so on. Triad got distinct roles, distinct profiles, we are accountable, so when we make a mistake, we are easier to remove than a Zerg-like entity that proclaims they can do it all with flexibility and minimum rules, where Triad is fatalistic, locked, too many rules and so on.
If you believe in that smaller factions should also run the game, not a generic mass with no true core identity, please vote Triad.
I will just warn new players that there are a few unwritten rules, acted out within this game, that the tribals seem to follow, rules not explicitly stated in order to win more voters, but crypto-rules still in effect. Do not expect it to be YOUR flexibility, YOUR influence or YOUR vision to be enacted in the game, as tribals is firmly into the hands of 3-5 core players, and they or may not listen to you. There is a reason they want to close out the smaller factions, where Legion took mercy and invited us in
the famous longbowman story, I did a singular mistake with not listening to two players (don't worry all will be revealed in time), and my in-game point was proven right in the end. I acknowledged that mistake, very much unlike you and a few others that is firmly within the tribal camp, that never did apologize wrongs even when it was obvious and most agreed.
If you believe in that smaller factions should also run the game, not a generic mass with no true core identity, please vote Triad.
2. The Chief has final authority in all matters...and Council decisions are passed by a simple majority, however, the Chief always has the power to override the council. ...They would put you on the council in good faith, to appease the independent voters, only to overturn every decision you make...kwarriorpeot says in his post We indeed see the tribal council as the earliest form of a democratic government......
I'm not big in talking diplomacy or persuading independants to vote one way or another, but if we're talking about getting opportunities in Factions I only have one simple argument:
Look at the date I joined this forum, look at my post count, and know that I made it to Leader of the Warlord Faction [one of the Triad coalition partners].
I rest my case.