Question from a Birther

Status
Not open for further replies.
Already said that, and bumped cause I hate not getting the page topper ;)

Look, the Phantom Time Hypothesis is pretty self explanatory. The problem is that you believe this is "actually" 2009 when it's really not.

Also, since Kodos would also have been ineligible, you guys must know what this means. Ross Perot should have been President!
 
If President Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961 as his "birth certificate" and some news paper announcements claim, then why does his myspace say that he is 52 instead of 48?

http://www.myspace.com/barackobama

Can somebody help me out with this, or is it just another part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy?

You're right, you should forward the MySpace address to Orly Taitz.

84 instead of 48 is a typo, or maybe 58, 47, or 59 as all those digits are close to each other on the keyboard. 52 instead of 48 ........................ not so much methinks.

It is his MySpace for his re-election in 2012.
 
If I didn't know any better, I'd say all these people are some kind of gimmick set up by the Obama administration... I mean, this is all pretty brilliant; even if Obama was impeached on the grounds he was born elsewhere (which wouldn't happen in a trillion years), Joe Biden would be president and Obama would be martyred.

Kind of like how JFK led to LBJ... a mediocre president replaced by someone much, much worse.
 
Kind of like how JFK led to LBJ... a mediocre president replaced by someone much, much worse.

Your comparison is hurt by the fact that both JFK and LBJ were decent presidents at worst. And the fact that Obama promises to be pretty good, and Biden wouldn't be half bad either. But I'm sure there's something insightful that can be salvaged from your punditry, just not sure what.
 
WND said:
WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.
this is kinda creepy, they want his
Kindergarten records, WTH?
his school records, WTH do they have to do with being a citizen?
the list goes on and on,
WHY DO THEY WANT THIS STUFF????
are they just stalkers?
 
Your comparison is hurt by the fact that both JFK and LBJ were decent presidents at worst. And the fact that Obama promises to be pretty good, and Biden wouldn't be half bad either. But I'm sure there's something insightful that can be salvaged from your punditry, just not sure what.
Damn it, man, I want Goldwater in '64!

President Barry Goldwater, '65-'73
President William E. Miller, '73-'81
President Ronald Reagan, '81-'89
President Jeane Kirkpatrick, '89-'97
President Pete Wilson, '97-'05
President Ron Paul, '05-present
 
Damn it, man, I want Goldwater in '64!

President Barry Goldwater, '65-'73
President William E. Miller, '73-'81
President Ronald Reagan, '81-'89
President Jeane Kirkpatrick, '89-'97
President Pete Wilson, '97-'05
President Ron Paul, '05-present

:vomit:
 
What? It's not my fault Robert Taft served three terms from '53 to '65.

There there, no need to be afraid. By the end of Goldwater's term, the US would have been a radioactive wasteland anyways, and there would be no more elections to let those other, horrible people take the White House.
Kennedy was a lot more reckless in his brinkmanship than Goldwater ever was.
 
What? It's not my fault Robert Taft served three terms from '53 to '65.

Okay, you can be afraid again Civking. Taft would have crashed our economy bad enough that we would never get the chance to kill ourselves in nuclear warfare, and the other candidates could proceed on schedule.

Amadeus said:
Kennedy was a lot more reckless in his brinkmanship than Goldwater ever was.

Kennedy gambled with the Russians once, and with good reason. Goldwater wouldn't have been satisfied as long as the soviet union was still standing.
 
Okay, you can be afraid again Civking. Taft would have crashed our economy bad enough that we would never get the chance to kill ourselves in nuclear warfare, and the other candidates could proceed on schedule.
What are you talking about? Taft inherited a booming economy from the outgoing MacArthur administration. :mischief:
 
What are you talking about? Taft inherited a booming economy from the outgoing MacArthur administration. :mischief:

Robert Taft's policies could singlehandedly ruin any economy. Also, McArthur's boom would have been shortlived anyways. Instead of Vietnam as the ultimate example of a pointless and seemingly endless war, we would have had the Chinese war.
 
Robert Taft's policies could singlehandedly ruin any economy. Also, McArthur's boom would have been shortlived anyways. Instead of Vietnam as the ultimate example of a pointless and seemingly endless war, we would have had the Chinese war.
Wait... :D
 
Your timeline is collapsing on itself. If Lindbergh was president, no one would ever hear of McArthur.

At least not until the Nazis invaded North America.
Actually, I was thinking that Lindbergh would've supported the Japanese... so really, we wouldn't be fighting a war with the communists. :lol:
 
You see the problems? Besides, I'm assuming your timeline begins with the Articles of Confederation being kept, so really, we wouldn't get more than a few generations before the US was invaded by one of the European powers or collapsed on itself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom